I agree, personally I am not sure what hands I can call, it´s probably ok to go All-in or fold with no call at all, it´s not the kind of spot you can get a solution with a solver besides Snowie and it´s difficult to trust Snowie on these spots, I am still working on my 50bbs strategy :P (Snowie is doing call on this situation)

mm, I though shove is the play, but yeah not the best spot :)

Yup I think it's a very easy shove against SB vs BTN open, esp that 3bet sizing is very juicy :D

Calling range could add some EV but for the most part jamming/folding is the play

1/ Tell me what hands I am winning against betting on the flop and going to the River and checking besides the fact that some bluffs are likely to bluff again somewhere else. That´s why I did fold but I understand it´s probably a GTO call, I have some equity for a shitty flush but it´s something. I dond mind call, dont get me wrong but sometimes I make decisions based on logic more than solvers, I thought it was a bad spot to continue with 77 and probably you are right and it´s a ok call but definetely is not a crazy fold either.

2/ Turn bet 33% 3betpot IP? in highstakes? I dont know what spot it was but it´s difficult to believe it was playing in position (OOP it´s ok) The right logic/Gto way and to play In position 3betpots it´s to bet on the turn with bluffs and hands you are happy to go all in on the river and check all the other hands, there are exceptions but I prefer check with KQ on that one.

2/. Exactly, here is a bunch of proofs:
1 https://www.weaktight.com/h/5abeba10d390438b6d8b4873
2 https://www.weaktight.com/h/5abeba46d39043d8668b4831
3 https://www.weaktight.com/h/5abeba74d390435b0d8b46d1
4 https://www.weaktight.com/h/5abeba9ad39043ed0f8b4866
5 https://www.weaktight.com/h/5abebac5d390438b6d8b4898
6 https://www.weaktight.com/h/5abebae7d390435b0d8b46eb
7 https://www.weaktight.com/h/5abebb0ed39043180d8b4782
8 https://www.weaktight.com/h/5abebb30d39043180d8b479e
9 https://www.weaktight.com/h/5abebb66d39043d1688b4961
10 https://www.weaktight.com/h/5abebb8ed39043bf228b48d6
As you can see, a lot of regulars use this low turn cbet in position in 3bet pots, including turns when flush came.

2/ That´s pretty interesting, I remember when I was studying with Pio in position it would recomend most of the times 50% on the flop and 30% on some special boards and rarely/never 1/3 of the pot on the turn after cbet on the flop.

I have to take a second look on this strategy, thank you for bringing it up to me!

Preflop I´ve been trying new things lately so I prefer to wait before I say anything about the way I approach it, I definetely made a lot of changes lately. Anyway I have to recognize that I felt myself annoying in my first videos when I was saying on everyhand things about my preflop play, sore throat and very little useful information, I´ll try to remember to explain preflop things (in case I know what I am doing XD) if the hand is interesting.

AQ: I dont remember the spot so I am not sure but maybe you are right.

20:20 When I said he is bluffing I meant Mescarl, not pokerlukka, he did raise on the Turn after calling check raise on the flop and then I said 44 like thinking, Lukka won, I mixed it up so it´s confusing yes..

22:15: :P

Ah sorry I thought the 44 hand the action was bet/call, but you can interpretate that 2 ways, you were right it was bet raise call :)!

AQ spot is @11.30 fwiw

Just checked the AQ hand, that was All In yep hehe

On 3straight boards Pio doesn´t recomend stronger sizings, it will recomend 50% or 30% more often because our overpairs will suffer a lot on 30-50% of the Turns if he does call, I agree with you if the board is T85 or something like that. I thought the same as you in the past but then I found myself in terrible spots on the turn with my overpairs and very little options but X-folding.

Actually I am putting all of those sizings because I want to know if Pio will recomend a different play, and it did on the river, I wasn´t considering 1/3 with my middle pair

Ty man!
Cheers