High Rolling with Daniel Dvoress (Part 5)
Posted by Daniel Dvoress
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 8 Comments...
Enjoyed the video. Really like this format and I think you convey your thought process really well. There are lots of FT replays of Stars FT's available and I would like to see more analysis in this format.
Thank you!
is that QTo Call SB v BTN with 15bb at 20:30 a good play pre-flop?
of course it isn't.. it's a 3bshove or a fold, it depends from how much do you think BTN is opening in that spot... with those specific stacks i think he's opening up a bunch of hands so our reshove is probably positive enough to 3bet jam
i really enjoyed this video.. watching and analizing cards up replays in way more interesting because there are more spots to discuss about than in a normal review where whe only know hero's cards.. i hope i'll see some other your videos soon :)
Thanks!
Really enjoyed this format. Please make more videos like this with cards exposed at FT's in the future. Thanks!
BTN AQs vs. BB 87s hand: I noticed a couple of things in addition to what you addressed that seemed like errors...perhaps I'm crazy?
Flop sizing by OOP (b21%)--this seems way too small both with combo and (generally) with range for this board/this ICM setup, no? OOP's 3b range will contain a lot of strong Ax combos that want to go at least 40-50% pot, as well as a lot of bluff combos that want to force immediate folds from the weaker parts of IP's range...seems like 21% is far too low to accomplish either of these things. Vs. b21%, IP should be continuing with any pair (even 33 no BDFD has the BDSD...), which doesn't seem like a good result for OOP.
GIVEN b21% from OOP on flop, AQs BDFD just seems like a raise for IP, no? Vs. b21% this combo for IP just seems like fat value that wants to get more money into the pot immediately...I say this cognizant of the range interaction at play (IP's range has to play with deference to some degree to OOP's 3b range), but still.
As played, facing b36% from OOP on the river, again, AQ just seems like an easy raise for IP, no? Really have nothing more to add to this bullet point other than saying that this combo is just...really, really strong given the action leading to this point, and given OOP's betsize. Obv. vs. b100% or whatever we're just snap-flatting AQ, but vs. this size it seems criminal to not squeeze more value out of our combo, no?
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.