Thanks Henry great video.
Cool to see how to break down the ranges street by street. They are narrower in these deep spots, so that makes for some nice handreading.
Suggestion for a vid sometime in the future if you and others find this interesting: A bit of "theory" on deep stack play. I would love to play more deepstack but do not really know how to adjust sizing, how to apply pressure IP (frequent low bets or more higher bets), which bluffs to pick and so on. There are some videos on here but mostly not for us Essential fellows (I might be wrong; maybe I overlooked some vids).
Hey. I appreciate the idea but in the past I have mostly played 100bb eff. online therefore studied 100bb. So I don't think I would produce the best content for this.
This does remind me I need to study deeper play more though as I do play it a considerable amount nowadays.
I would anticipate close to no bluffs vs the vast majority of population and therefore require enough value domination to justify calling - I would generally want a full house here and folding anything worse. Vs some I will only call KK+ (blocking AK) given I believe they lack bluffs and don't jam enough worse hands to call.
Great video. I love how you go street by street with all the range composition. giving me a lot of thoughts how I need to think of range vs range when in play. Great job mate!
Loved the format, great video!
Honestly, all 3 hands showed different aspects of play that can get overlooked. Getting max value from whales, can't really define the aspect of the 2nd hand (trying for a few minutes lmao), and spots that lack bluffs specially if pre-flop ranges are not ""perfect"" in theory.
Hi, very good, thx! Those kind of videos are the best, at least for me. So please, do those more:)
Btw in second hand I have found quite obvious what "winner" held on that flop mini raise, it was quite straightforward. But sure, confusion kicks in, if we start overthinking and too academically analyze it. And exactly for that reason the "winner" (most probably unintentionally) played it in the best possible way regardless on theory:)
Loading 9 Comments...
Thanks Henry great video.
Cool to see how to break down the ranges street by street. They are narrower in these deep spots, so that makes for some nice handreading.
Suggestion for a vid sometime in the future if you and others find this interesting: A bit of "theory" on deep stack play. I would love to play more deepstack but do not really know how to adjust sizing, how to apply pressure IP (frequent low bets or more higher bets), which bluffs to pick and so on. There are some videos on here but mostly not for us Essential fellows (I might be wrong; maybe I overlooked some vids).
Hey. I appreciate the idea but in the past I have mostly played 100bb eff. online therefore studied 100bb. So I don't think I would produce the best content for this.
This does remind me I need to study deeper play more though as I do play it a considerable amount nowadays.
That's fine as well, of course. Learning a ton from your vids anyhow :)
whats the worst hand you would call in that last spot seems super under bluffed?
I would anticipate close to no bluffs vs the vast majority of population and therefore require enough value domination to justify calling - I would generally want a full house here and folding anything worse. Vs some I will only call KK+ (blocking AK) given I believe they lack bluffs and don't jam enough worse hands to call.
Great video. I love how you go street by street with all the range composition. giving me a lot of thoughts how I need to think of range vs range when in play. Great job mate!
Loved the format, great video!
Honestly, all 3 hands showed different aspects of play that can get overlooked. Getting max value from whales, can't really define the aspect of the 2nd hand (trying for a few minutes lmao), and spots that lack bluffs specially if pre-flop ranges are not ""perfect"" in theory.
Hi, very good, thx! Those kind of videos are the best, at least for me. So please, do those more:)
Btw in second hand I have found quite obvious what "winner" held on that flop mini raise, it was quite straightforward. But sure, confusion kicks in, if we start overthinking and too academically analyze it. And exactly for that reason the "winner" (most probably unintentionally) played it in the best possible way regardless on theory:)
HH#1 You mention the cold 4 bet of 2bb-6bb-21bb is extremely small given their stack depth. What sizing would you use here?
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.