AA with a diamond makes it more likely that he has TT-KK because we block the Adxd and AdKx type of hands. So i'd be likely jamming AdAx.
Aces in general where the spr is less than 1 on the turn can be checked to balance/ induce. I would go with my gut feeling whether to jam or check vs different types of opponents.
Catogorize different types of regulars in groups. Make an alias in HEM2 or PT4 and check stats and see what stands out in the different types of groups.
Just boats and flushes as my default. Add some stronger 6x to my range when i am relatively sure my opponent doesnt check back flushdraws and/ or traps.
You do a great job in every video I’ve watched. This format is very good for studying imo.
I am very interested in the AQo hand vs the limp re-raise by the rec player, because I play live and this happens a lot. Do you still like a fold if he is deeper ? ($500). Do you call if you know he plays badly postflop? Thanks. I face this spot very often, mostly when I’m the raiser though and they limp reraise from utg. It’s often very strong and AQ does poorly hot/cold but it’s not uncommon to see TT or JJ and they go broke with a full stack on Q high flop like in the video because they are live players: example they cbet way too big, pot grows large and they can’t fold on a later street on low runout.
Thank you!
Yes when being deeper oop it is less likely they stack off with worse when we hit toppair. So i think we should fold even being deep. Its not hard to play postflop if his range is so strong so even weak players are doing alrigt vs AQo.
Live limp reraises are imo even stronger, i mean u often know the guy and have some reads to make the right play with your specific holdings. AQo plays poorly vs a very tight range.
This format is much better than the standard 4 table stuff you've done, in my opinion. We get much richer discussion of every hand, and it's not as hectic. Thanks!
Hey Mark, in this video and a lot of your videos you mention the WWSF % stat. Can you (or anyone) explain the significance of the WWSF stat more for me please? If a player has a high % does this automatically mean he's very aggressive?
That's how often you win, given that you see the flop.
It's obviously influenced by a few things. For example, if you're tighter from the BB preflop than you should be, you'll have stronger holdings more often and won't fold as much vs cbets.
But generally, the most likely thing to make you have a higher WWSF is playing more aggressively, and taking bluff spots. Players with low WWSF are generally more likely to give up when they miss than players with high WWSF.
Loading 21 Comments...
I like your summary of the different factors you consider in the hand
@ 3:40 with AA on the turn do you think having AA combos with a diamond make a good turn check ?
AA with a diamond makes it more likely that he has TT-KK because we block the Adxd and AdKx type of hands. So i'd be likely jamming AdAx.
Aces in general where the spr is less than 1 on the turn can be checked to balance/ induce. I would go with my gut feeling whether to jam or check vs different types of opponents.
also what is a good way to see what population tendencies are? thx for the vid
Catogorize different types of regulars in groups. Make an alias in HEM2 or PT4 and check stats and see what stands out in the different types of groups.
I enjoy these videos going hand by hand in the replayer!
5 minute, would you overbet river with any of your 6x? If yes which ones?
Nice call at 33 minute with KQ, looks like a gross spot
Just boats and flushes as my default. Add some stronger 6x to my range when i am relatively sure my opponent doesnt check back flushdraws and/ or traps.
Kq at min 33 is a fold vs most typical regs.
You do a great job in every video I’ve watched. This format is very good for studying imo.
I am very interested in the AQo hand vs the limp re-raise by the rec player, because I play live and this happens a lot. Do you still like a fold if he is deeper ? ($500). Do you call if you know he plays badly postflop? Thanks. I face this spot very often, mostly when I’m the raiser though and they limp reraise from utg. It’s often very strong and AQ does poorly hot/cold but it’s not uncommon to see TT or JJ and they go broke with a full stack on Q high flop like in the video because they are live players: example they cbet way too big, pot grows large and they can’t fold on a later street on low runout.
Thank you!
Yes when being deeper oop it is less likely they stack off with worse when we hit toppair. So i think we should fold even being deep. Its not hard to play postflop if his range is so strong so even weak players are doing alrigt vs AQo.
Live limp reraises are imo even stronger, i mean u often know the guy and have some reads to make the right play with your specific holdings. AQo plays poorly vs a very tight range.
This format is much better than the standard 4 table stuff you've done, in my opinion. We get much richer discussion of every hand, and it's not as hectic. Thanks!
Does anyone know of any other RIO videos in this format? I really enjoy it.
The next one :)
Enjoyed the format of this video, would like to see more like this
Hey Mark, in this video and a lot of your videos you mention the WWSF % stat. Can you (or anyone) explain the significance of the WWSF stat more for me please? If a player has a high % does this automatically mean he's very aggressive?
Thanks, enjoyed the video
That's how often you win, given that you see the flop.
It's obviously influenced by a few things. For example, if you're tighter from the BB preflop than you should be, you'll have stronger holdings more often and won't fold as much vs cbets.
But generally, the most likely thing to make you have a higher WWSF is playing more aggressively, and taking bluff spots. Players with low WWSF are generally more likely to give up when they miss than players with high WWSF.
I think radtupperware explained it very well.
Nice with reviews like this.
Can have it on the side while grinding 1 table etc.
Zoom in play etc goes to fast.
Cheers good video.
@12:05 this is a standard flat from you? I assumed 88 was a 3b at decent frequency (SNOWIE)?
Thanks
It's a mix for me.
Enjoyed the video :-)
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.