A++ content Seth, really appreciate the work you put in. Also once again you give good ideas into how to organize one's own off the table work. Please keep it up!
- 542r How come you do not allow BB leads? I am pretty confident BB should do a non neglectable amount if leading here. Is it because of the current meta game where pop does not lead enough on these baords and you don't want to skew the results?
- 12.40 We have to realize this is vs PIO. Almost no one is x/raising as aggressively as PIO is. Esp considering the fact that most people prolly over C-bet this boards and BB thus should x/r even more aggressively. So dont you think vs most opps getting in TT here is torching and by quite a bit?
- 19.30 I think you are a bit off here. 96s and T6s are actually blocking quite a bit of IPs b/f range. I suppose PIO is still using these combos as they just have to little SDV to x/call.
Sorry that this has taken me this long to respond, it slipped through the cracks.
a) Right, I haven't allowed BB leads because not that many people play leads here. It's a valuable thing to learn but it's probably more productive to train versus ranges that are closer to real life.
b) This is probably true of most opponents, I agree. But, if you look at the x/raise range here it's not crazy to think that humans are close, at least in frequency. For example we see 3x and 5x are both very passive. But yea, equilibriums are fragile and it wouldn't take that tight of a player to make the TT stackoff a big torch.
c) Good catch, the T and 9 are actually quite bad for forcing IP folds. They fall into a class of hands that has good turn playability as the aggressor but poor playability as the defender, like you said.
Loading 3 Comments...
A++ content Seth, really appreciate the work you put in. Also once again you give good ideas into how to organize one's own off the table work. Please keep it up!
- 542r How come you do not allow BB leads? I am pretty confident BB should do a non neglectable amount if leading here. Is it because of the current meta game where pop does not lead enough on these baords and you don't want to skew the results?
- 12.40 We have to realize this is vs PIO. Almost no one is x/raising as aggressively as PIO is. Esp considering the fact that most people prolly over C-bet this boards and BB thus should x/r even more aggressively. So dont you think vs most opps getting in TT here is torching and by quite a bit?
- 19.30 I think you are a bit off here. 96s and T6s are actually blocking quite a bit of IPs b/f range. I suppose PIO is still using these combos as they just have to little SDV to x/call.
Sorry that this has taken me this long to respond, it slipped through the cracks.
a) Right, I haven't allowed BB leads because not that many people play leads here. It's a valuable thing to learn but it's probably more productive to train versus ranges that are closer to real life.
b) This is probably true of most opponents, I agree. But, if you look at the x/raise range here it's not crazy to think that humans are close, at least in frequency. For example we see 3x and 5x are both very passive. But yea, equilibriums are fragile and it wouldn't take that tight of a player to make the TT stackoff a big torch.
c) Good catch, the T and 9 are actually quite bad for forcing IP folds. They fall into a class of hands that has good turn playability as the aggressor but poor playability as the defender, like you said.
Underrated coach great work
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.