$500 Zoom: Back on Stars w/ Plenty of Regs

Posted by

You’re watching:

$500 Zoom: Back on Stars w/ Plenty of Regs

user avatar

Gary Chappell

Elite Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

$500 Zoom: Back on Stars w/ Plenty of Regs

user avatar

Gary Chappell

POSTED Jul 25, 2021

Gary Chappell jumps back into the Zoom pool on Stars after a brief departure for the games on GG and battles it out against a slew of tough regulars looking to squeeze out some EV where he can.

7 Comments

Loading 7 Comments...

RunItTw1ce 3 years, 8 months ago

5:20 Table #2 with AJ on the AKJhh-4x-2x run out. I don't think I can fold here unless I had a heart. I think villain can value bet worse as well right? KJ might be thin, but may also have hands like A4h A2h that decides to jam instead of XC. I agree with your logic of being a good board for IP, so BB will have less bluffs here, but before I even consider bluffs I would ask myself if he can value bet a worse hand? The bluffs I do see coming from Th9x, Qh9x, and KxTh at some frequency. Almost feels disrespectful to fold this hand to Jarretman.

46:15 Table #1 with QT on the QT668 board. I think if we are considering folding this river, then we have to consider 3betting the flop right? There are so many straight draws that A, K, J, 9, 8, 7, 6, are all some what bad cards that two wants some protection to least narrow the range down to open ended and get rid of some of the gut shots right?

Gary Chappell 3 years, 8 months ago

AJ - happy with my fold. A4-A2 don't play like this flop and turn, and its too thin on the river imo. I don't want to have a J as there may be some bluffs drawn from JT/JQ. Possibly could call vs Jarretman, but vs population I think its a fine fold.

QT - Tbh I don't think I was ever going to fold, I just think I was going through all possibilities out loud. 3betting the flop is definitely fine, yes.

Gary Chappell 3 years, 8 months ago

yeah looks fine. i know i was deviating from solver by folding, but as i said i just think its underbluffed so i'd happily just call AK+.

joomorrow 3 years, 8 months ago

46:15 Table 1 - I don't think your QsTh block any value hands (as the 6s and 6h are already on the board, and villain unlikely to defend Q6o T6o). Probably still a call, but more because it unblocks bluffs. Maybe a hand like AcQd would be a better call?

joomorrow 3 years, 8 months ago

You are right that QT is still a better call than AQ, but BB doesn't have TT in his range (pure 3-bet pre) and unlikely to shove 1.5x pot with QT on the river (too thin, block value targets).

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy