Not a fan of folding the flush at 19:54. 5d and 4d block nut flush combos more than any other, and should be betting the turn almost always, and I can absolutely see a player jamming with the Ad to get you off a chop, I would probably do it every time since half pot appears capped. I think the real question should be whether you fold an A, not a flush.
On the other hand, love the fold at the end of the video. Made a few calls in similar spots recently and shown the bad news, can definitely get behind that this spot will be way under bluffed especially considering the logic you explained.
6min t#3 I think AK is a clear value bet. Wizard preflop and post flop sizes will be off but as a guideline wizard is betting 100% of the time, but using a 2.5x open and a 12bb 3bet. Seems too weak to check back AK on AJ8-Kcc-Jx board. Is the check back only because you are deeper stack and at 100bb you would just be playing for stacks?
20:00 54d on T#3 would love to see a PIO version of this. Wizard doesn't have any flushes that bet + call off river and at 100bb it's just jamming the river with all it's flushes for like 3x pot. I'm not sure how the extra 50bb effective plays into bet + fold. Have to assume 3bets from 87d 76d preflop that check back turn or AQd Q9d that check back turn. Then hope your half pot didn't induce anything. Just a lot of assumptions to make. To me looks like a bluff catcher, I agree not loving it, but I don't think I can find a fold here give a B-X-B line in a 3BP with KTJddd on the board. Wizard turn AdQx-AdTx into high frequency bluffs. I know practice is different but any regrets folding flush here?
29:10 T#1 with AKs vs the crazy player given the called your 4bet earlier in the video ATo vs his Q3s how come you don't size way up on your 4bets? Just go closer to 3x or even 4x instead of the standard sizing?
AK - I gave my reasons in video for checking which I think are sound. In different positions I would definitely value bet whereby my opponent has more Ax hands and I have more potential bluffs, but in these positions where ranges are narrow BB will hero call Ax less often because I just don't have enough T9s/8x etc.
54dd - thought about this a lot and I'm happy with the fold from the hand dynamic and metagame. See my explanation above.
AK - I want to keep all their crap in, I crush their range, im in position, and want to have some level of postflop playability.
So does neither one of you want to take me up on a heads up match?
I am willing to play either one of you but the only rule that I have is that you would have to do the exact play the RTA suggests. You can't use it and use your own best judgment and pick and choose. So if I found a play suspect, and I went into GTO Wizard and it says you should have called but folded then that would be against the rules.
If RTA will crush me then this should be easy money for you guys. Either one of you want to take me up on it? I am willing to put up a $1,000. I don't know how many hands should be played but as long as you do the exact play that GTO Wizard tells you to then I'll do it.
Not interested. And that’s not an acceptance that you’re right (which will inevitably be your response of this thread is anything to go by lol). I just cba with it or any dealings with you tbh. I’m not sure it’s even feasible with RTA banned / HU tables non-existent.
Please go challenge Nuno HU and maybe he'll make a video for us. ;-) What likely happens is you post something, find out you are wrong, then you decide to delete it and we all just waste our time. Claim that you can't beat a human in six max, but CAN beat someone using RTA in HU is LMAO! If you think 99 is not value betting HU on K642 you are in for a rude awakening.
Loading 20 Comments...
Always a fan of the GG content, keep it coming!
Not a fan of folding the flush at 19:54. 5d and 4d block nut flush combos more than any other, and should be betting the turn almost always, and I can absolutely see a player jamming with the Ad to get you off a chop, I would probably do it every time since half pot appears capped. I think the real question should be whether you fold an A, not a flush.
On the other hand, love the fold at the end of the video. Made a few calls in similar spots recently and shown the bad news, can definitely get behind that this spot will be way under bluffed especially considering the logic you explained.
Yeh I wasn't sure with the 54dd, but I think they can definitely check back nut flush seeing as they block my calling range, eg Ax.
6min t#3 I think AK is a clear value bet. Wizard preflop and post flop sizes will be off but as a guideline wizard is betting 100% of the time, but using a 2.5x open and a 12bb 3bet. Seems too weak to check back AK on AJ8-Kcc-Jx board. Is the check back only because you are deeper stack and at 100bb you would just be playing for stacks?
20:00 54d on T#3 would love to see a PIO version of this. Wizard doesn't have any flushes that bet + call off river and at 100bb it's just jamming the river with all it's flushes for like 3x pot. I'm not sure how the extra 50bb effective plays into bet + fold. Have to assume 3bets from 87d 76d preflop that check back turn or AQd Q9d that check back turn. Then hope your half pot didn't induce anything. Just a lot of assumptions to make. To me looks like a bluff catcher, I agree not loving it, but I don't think I can find a fold here give a B-X-B line in a 3BP with KTJddd on the board. Wizard turn AdQx-AdTx into high frequency bluffs. I know practice is different but any regrets folding flush here?
29:10 T#1 with AKs vs the crazy player given the called your 4bet earlier in the video ATo vs his Q3s how come you don't size way up on your 4bets? Just go closer to 3x or even 4x instead of the standard sizing?
Keep the videos coming :-)
AK - I gave my reasons in video for checking which I think are sound. In different positions I would definitely value bet whereby my opponent has more Ax hands and I have more potential bluffs, but in these positions where ranges are narrow BB will hero call Ax less often because I just don't have enough T9s/8x etc.
54dd - thought about this a lot and I'm happy with the fold from the hand dynamic and metagame. See my explanation above.
AK - I want to keep all their crap in, I crush their range, im in position, and want to have some level of postflop playability.
I won’t be making and further comments on this. It’s been exhausted and become toxic. Let’s all move on and make better use of our time.
I appreciate you taking the time to explain and I see what you are saying now.
I deleted my other comments so that anyone that comes after me, won't be skeptical of you since you have done nothing wrong.
Again, I'm sorry about that and please accept my sincere apology and if you don't then I completely understand that as well.
explains why my comments got removed as they were responses to yours.
So does neither one of you want to take me up on a heads up match?
I am willing to play either one of you but the only rule that I have is that you would have to do the exact play the RTA suggests. You can't use it and use your own best judgment and pick and choose. So if I found a play suspect, and I went into GTO Wizard and it says you should have called but folded then that would be against the rules.
If RTA will crush me then this should be easy money for you guys. Either one of you want to take me up on it? I am willing to put up a $1,000. I don't know how many hands should be played but as long as you do the exact play that GTO Wizard tells you to then I'll do it.
Not interested. And that’s not an acceptance that you’re right (which will inevitably be your response of this thread is anything to go by lol). I just cba with it or any dealings with you tbh. I’m not sure it’s even feasible with RTA banned / HU tables non-existent.
Thanks for the apology. Good luck to you.
Please go challenge Nuno HU and maybe he'll make a video for us. ;-) What likely happens is you post something, find out you are wrong, then you decide to delete it and we all just waste our time. Claim that you can't beat a human in six max, but CAN beat someone using RTA in HU is LMAO! If you think 99 is not value betting HU on K642 you are in for a rude awakening.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.