Are you going to go on the mechanics of poker podcast? I always see people in the comments asking for you to go on. Since Mathew Marinelli went on I thought maybe you will be going on as well.

Interesting video, enjoyed the general information at the start about the 200z GG games.
At 4.40 you mentioned that many weak regs are multi tabling and easily over run. By this do you mean that they are susceptible to over folding in certain lines or vs certain bet sizes?

At 6.50 you decided to call 97cc on QQ4r. Is this just because people fold too much to BB bets on the river in general? Is this information sufficient on its on to make it a call here, or do players under cbet the turn as well in general or on this specific paired board texture?

At 21.15 you said that if we remove OOP option to raise that we will always take a size which we want with our specific hand. I was wondering would the same be true if villains would never bluff-raise? I feel that this may be true as we would always fold and hence not lose any value anyway. As a further extension to this would villain only slightly under-bluffing with their raises cause the same effect?

Hey Nacho, really good video. I enjoy the 2 tables as you can go deep into the spots, the pace is great and discussion about the pool & overall strategy is very nice. I hope you can do more in the future!

28:37 table 2 KQ hand I ran the sim and found even at equilibrium KQs is a pretty high frequency turn stab and pure give up on most rivers (T pure shove/and bluff on some 3x). Looks quite counterintuitive to me since it only folds out some TT/99 but also folds out all KX from villain's range.
Exploitatively vs a tighter 4b range from the pool I understand you said check is probably better later in the video but do you think if we xback turn we get to bluff a lot if villain checks river again?

34:28 Table 2 with 66, Is it because you think half pot is too mergey (since fish might size up his overpairs?) so you went for a raise, or is it other reasons?

On the turn node when he quickly calls flop (Do not think about 3betting flop I assume), do you think an exploitative turn bet could be more profitable since his hand will be more leaning towards Ax (picking up straight draw OTT) or FD and we should expect less bluff raise from a fish [his stats is 53-15-8 from the hud]?

Thank you!

Hey mx404 thanks for the feedback and questions! I honestly think my line is fine here, not sure what I said later exactly, but think blocking to give up river is reasonable. Our check on the river is actually worth a bit in equilibrium (as we in theory split sometimes vs KQ) and we have about the worst blockers to bluff:

The 66 hand: these low paired textures get check-raised quite often in general. Now if villain is using some multi-sizing equilibrium (like GTOW), then not so much, if he's using just B50/x then all pairs are raising at some frequency (tho we probably prefer to have the BDFD). Regardless: raising is fine, calling is fine as well. Barreling turn given quick call is probably a decent strategy, tho he likely is also making a ton of mistakes vs a check. Kind of a boring answer, but poker is like that sometimes: either way is fine here I think.

24:18 how would you play differently vs this kind of players who doesn't fold much and rather 3bet vs raise? I expect regs will respond well vs overbluffing on your stakes right?

Great video. I've railed some stars $200 zoom and it seems tougher than here.

24:04 JTs hand on 3447Q board, may I ask why you decided to bluff raise OTR? And what's the threshold of bluff raise on this spot? Thanks!