Very informative!

I find these heuristic building videos ueful and as a learning player new understanding opens up for me when hearing how profesionals think about spots, concepts - small bits here and there to understand the pussle of poker.

Can we get away with similiar strategies on non flush completing turns? You mentioned that A/K overcards are worse because of villains simplifying to range checking. I assume a similiar strategy makes sense on blanks/ straight completing cards and board pairing cards? Should we be playing overbets on say the A/K and what other boards could we do this?

This was a really excellent video, one of the best poker training videos I have seen in a long time. It was also the exact type of content I requested when you asked for content suggestions a little while back, so thanks also for taking on feedback in order to create your videos. I would be very keen for more content exactly like this, with the same format, that looks at other spots and corresponding exploits. I also have a few questions:

10.00 -
Please can you tell me what 'Turn - RB' stands for in the chart?

11.30 -
You talked briefly about how showdowns in data from most sites (where all holecards are not available in hand histories) are tainted by the fact that some hands (presumably strong hands and hands with good blockers?) are over represented in the showdowns. How do you deal with this issue? I'm guessing that to find the real ratios of hand classes in each line you need to adjust downwards the % of strong hands that show up in each range, but I've no idea by how much. Is this effect more pronounced for data on earlier streets, i.e. the further you are from showdown, given that the weaker hands have more streets to get through in order to reach showdown?

35.45 -
I understand the reasoning for wanting to create a subtree if we are just focusing on turn play. But might it also be interesting to additionally use the whole sim without a sub tree, lock the turn strategy, and then see how PIO might also change its flop strategy in order to exploit its opponent on future streets? This might be profitable information if we suspect our opponents play well on the flop but badly on the turn, and we want to funnel certain hand types into different parts of the game tree to make the most of turn exploits.

I also suspect (without any data currently) that most people in the BB will over-bluff the river in a checked down pot. Does this align with your data for this line (i.e. Flop XX/ Turn XX/ River B)? If so, would this cause you to send all of your bluffs into the delayed cbet line, rather than checking some again on the turn to bluff river (aside from the boards that aren't over folded e.g. A turn)?