I think this video really shows the importance of not just relying on gto but that you need to develop reads and make exploititive adjustments. Gto and explotitive play go hand in hand.
How often do you do this kind of deep study where you incorporate opponent tendencies into a solver sim? Is it more efficient to just look at the baseline solver sim then extrapolate on your own how to adjust based on opponent tendencies?
3:40 if we chk turn and ip bets too much with those lower pocket pairs do we get to xr our overprs for thin value or does that open us up to rerasies or overfolds?
I prefer to work more on population tendencies -splitted in archetypes- than single player profiles. Playing in a restricted player pool it becomes one of the main parts of my study, as most of the edge relies in understanding in which ways archetypes of the pool deviates from equilibrium.
We definitely get to x/r more aggressively the more our opponents bets for protection. Once we go for the exploitative line on the turn we follow the solver for the river play. In general x/calling is good if villain likes to play very polarized and to overbluff, x/raising punishes players who bet too much mid value and draws - river is just a consequence of what decisions you took in the previous streets and of the resulting ranges.
Loading 2 Comments...
I think this video really shows the importance of not just relying on gto but that you need to develop reads and make exploititive adjustments. Gto and explotitive play go hand in hand.
How often do you do this kind of deep study where you incorporate opponent tendencies into a solver sim? Is it more efficient to just look at the baseline solver sim then extrapolate on your own how to adjust based on opponent tendencies?
3:40 if we chk turn and ip bets too much with those lower pocket pairs do we get to xr our overprs for thin value or does that open us up to rerasies or overfolds?
Thanks!
I prefer to work more on population tendencies -splitted in archetypes- than single player profiles. Playing in a restricted player pool it becomes one of the main parts of my study, as most of the edge relies in understanding in which ways archetypes of the pool deviates from equilibrium.
We definitely get to x/r more aggressively the more our opponents bets for protection. Once we go for the exploitative line on the turn we follow the solver for the river play. In general x/calling is good if villain likes to play very polarized and to overbluff, x/raising punishes players who bet too much mid value and draws - river is just a consequence of what decisions you took in the previous streets and of the resulting ranges.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.