Reviewing Mistakes: A Practical Learning Model
Posted by Francesco Lacriola
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 9 Comments...
Hello Francesco,
Really interesting module.
On 25mn30s, is it "only XcXd combos are pure defenses on the turn" or on the river?. On the turn it's just draw no?
Thank you
Arno
I'm referring to weak Pocket Pair combos, the combos that block both FDs are pure calls, as they have more implied odds against overpairs if you make a boat, because you're 100% sure that your outs are never going to complete a flush, which can induce a check by overpairs.
On the river they're all potential bluffcatchers, so they are never going to be pure calls.
Good video—you’re quite adept at explaining complex strategic principles in English
Nice breakdown on the way to study a hand. I think the pre solver macro look for me is more subconcious and automatic at this point.
16:45 it shows tt not barreling very much. I would think it needs the most protection and would barrel a lot especially being a future blocker to any straight.
18:10 when you show opponents calling range when we reraise turn it has front door flush draws being lower ev than back door flush draws. Why is that? Is it because his front door draws block more of our bluffing range?
Thanks!
TT is a bit thin as a turn bet with tight ranges. You generate protection on the flop with the bigger bet.
Do you mean in the Cbet/3bet all in line? It might be due to some combos the solver is using, but I believe there's not going to be a significative difference in real play.
Hey Francesco thanks for the video!
How deep will you go for the noise-free analysis in terms of assuming villain’s turn/river strategy and incorporate that into your gameplan? Thanks!
I would mostly base my assumptions on the current meta of the stakes I play (population tendencies) if it's not a very usual spot. We can go deeper to player profile (nit, overvaluer, creative, station, etc.) if the spot is more common and we have a bigger sample, but I wouldn't go deeper than that to individual player, as the risk is that we might be too assumptive in the analysis.
Yeah it is the turn barrel that gets raised so we stick it back in his face. Maybe the bdfd in his range unblocks more of our bluffing range making them higher ev for him to call.
It's a textbook on how to review your hand through a solver.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.