Hand Review: Tough Decisions with Bluffs and Value
Posted by Francesco Lacriola
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 4 Comments...
33:30 you say AhJd is a check on Kh Th 3s board. Was looking at a KT8cc board yesterday and solver seems to think it is a range bet. Are you checking because it is 3 ways?
Did you check this board MP vs BTN? It seems quite strange to me to see a range bet on a quite coordinated board texture with tighter ranges. It's possible that you gave the BTN a very weak calling range heavily imbalanced towards pocket pairs and suited connectors, therefore they completely miss such board and they struggle to defend against small bets.
Also playing 3way pots even when we are BTN vs SB and BB we don't get to range bet textures that can be profitable to approach with that strategy, as you won't generate the appropriate amount of fold equity to autoprofit against two players.
What percentage or frequency of the time do you think is correct to cbet 3 way?
RunItTw1ce it depends on several factors: if we're OOP against one or more players, if the texture is dry, drawy o hyper-dynamic and preflop ranges in play. If it's a super dry board (A 7 2 r) and we're IP n 2 players we can have a fairly high cbet frequency, if it's a super wet board (Q 9 8 ssx) and we're OOP against two players we will cbet less than 10% and can even consider just going for a range check.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.