Thanks for the kind comment. It takes around 30 min to discuss a board in depth (I didn't want to be superficial in my analysis), the goal of the video is to show how to analyze a specific dynamic, not to show multiple spots with a similar concept (I do lots of hand review videos for this).

I think it depends on your expectations before you watch something: some videos are about methodology, others are live play, others are themed. Every topic can be tackled from different angles and I thought this was the most appropriate for what I had in mind.

I like to develop and analyze multiple strategical options and always teach my students to do so, in order to have a deeper understanding of the game and be able to handle complexity. I understand this method is not for everyone and not everyone would like to watch a video like this, but at the same time none is forcing you to and there are lots of options that might better suit your taste.

I have to defend Francesco with regards to the title. Our titles are often only selected at a later stage and not always directly crafted by the pro. In this case it's likely that our (potentially poor) title choice did play a major role in raising wrong expectations for this video.

I did enjoy the video but obviously it's more of an exemplary deep dive to understand the concept opposed to an all-encompassing scripting video. I do believe that both learning approaches have their place and can enrich your understanding of the spot.

comment removed.

On very coordinated boards such as 6 7 8, 345, etc we'd rather use smaller bet sizes as you mentioned (anything between 30% and 60% works). We don't want to be extremely polar on such textures, because they're extremely dynamic and protection plays a role.

The overbet is common only on A high boards, because it's a sort of "way ahead way behind" type of spot and the IP player wants to bet an extremely polarized range. It also punishes players that play mixed strategies and check a very showdown value type range. It can also be implemented on other textures where the OOP player has a ton of strong sd value (KJ x, ATx) if they check. So it's something to consider not only against range checking, but an interesting exploit to poorly balanced checking ranges on more "static" board textures.

touché My comment was not "professional" by any means and RIO told me the coach doesn't choose the title, which was the main misunderstanding. As you question suggest, you don't have a clear grasp on what the strategy is, hence why we both would like to see more examples. The format itself is fine, just need more examples for clarity. I will edit my comment.