any kind of wsop footage with your commentary like the 25k Plo series would be awesome

Hi,
Re comments - thanks very much :)
Re suggestions - will keep cash game livestream in mind but its not an area where I have much recent experience so I've tried to direct focus towards those formats where I do, if I play a bunch in Vegas or w/e can certainly reevaluate though. In terms of WSOP advice, any particular area you were thinking of or specific questions you'd like to see answered?

The general idea of prolonging the betting IP and shortening it OOP is definitely fine and something you see happn in Solverland (although whether bc it attaches strategic importance to that concept or as a coincidental feature of the equilibrium determined by other factors is ofc tough to say).

As to your first question, I cant answer definitively, but based on other work with some degree of relevance to this situation I'd imagine you'd likely see some sizing shifts along the lines you mention on the more static boards (less likely on dynamic textures where equity denial assumes wider and greater relevance), however flop sizings shift less in response to SPR than turn sizings, presumably bc you still have more room to manoevre in order to be able to make an all-in bet on river, which is something that does seem to impact sizings significantly.

Hi, I could ofc be missing something, but I'm not sure theres a ton of mileage in that area because I dont see where it would fit in a decision making/strategy building framework, and, other than the relatively intuitive "draws do better vs made hands when more cards remain to be dealt", I also dont see any more general insights you can glean - hands with high equity could be poor candidates to bet with and vice versa, and the general problem with thinking street by street is (as any monker sim accidentally run without turns/rivers - and I've run more than I intended to :/ - will demonstrate) that it ends up overvaluing those high equity low "playability" type hands. Street-by-street functions that could be of some use would be things that clearly lead to implementable data, such as "how often do both players have a given range on a given flop/turn/riv?", "what is the current range v range equity/polarity situation?" and so on.

tyvm

More seriously, I get the point re those hands occurring infrequently, but I think anytime an action is taken basically always with a given range, it offers a clue as to the solvers "thought process", which is the real win in any investigation. Also, a little bit like the book writer who researches a ridiculously obscure topic as background and as a result becomes determined to find a way to shoehorn it into their work, if I have to dig for half an hour to find something that goes on with a subrange we have 0.3% of the time, you better believe you're gonna hear about it in a video :)