I think if you have a read that he is a maniac and might jam some random garbage you can bet/call here. I feel like randoms in the million won't really do that tho and they probably have a strong range to begin with after flatting from his stack size. 

28 min: Yeah it seems like there was a long stretch of me just folding. Blinds are up from 300/600 to 600/1200 so it is possible to be blinded down getting no cards. 

ty :)

Glad you liked it!

Yes, I counted implied odds for whole stack. We hit a set about 1 time of 8 situations. Do u think 16,5:1 to call is insufficient? It's 3bet pot - his range is gonna be kind of strong, so we dont necessary need say 20:1, I guess.
may be Iam wrong tho :|

If I got this right we need to win 9555 (we get ~3-1 direct odds, we are 1 of 8 to hit, therefore need to make 5 more of 1911 (5x1911=9555) on avg postflop when we hit to BE. Rly don't know if this is the right way to do this, would love correction if Im wrong.) We are 24193 effective post. It seems kind of doable given even when he misses he will prob cbet into a pot of 7662, and when he has the blade prob stacks off for the full 24193. 

Thanks for feedback! As always, people like different things, someone else said they like to see only my hands, you want to see all so it seems like my plan of doing different things in different parts of this series will work out well. 

I am not the best at theory/powerpoint/deep math stuff, but I will take it into consideration. 

About opening small pairs EP it is something I don't always do and might actually be a little leak of mine. I checked my database after your comment and I do indeed lose slightly from EP with 22-55 over a pretty small sample (4k hands) with less than 50bb. the loss is -5.03bb/100 with a vpip of 60. If we assume there is an ante most of the time or about half of the time with stacks less than 50bb in todays mtts, we lose between -10bb/100 and -20bb/100 depending on the size of the ante by folding and giving it up. So by this sample of about a year playing mtts I guess you can say I'm doing slightly better or about break even playing them. I don't know what sort of sample you need to find out exactly, but I think it gives us at least an idea.

I think I like barreling the AK or check back is a slightly better option especially after seeing results ofc. with AQ I like throwing a little bet out there. If we do check our range feels sort of face up. Do you want to c/c 1 bet or check call all of it? It just seems like we are giving him a chance to win by bluffing or draw out on us with worse hands and be able to play his midpairs for max value to protect bluffs against our somewhat faceup hand. 

1. It really depends on your opponent. People tend to shove on button 3bets because the power of them is that they always have position. So we can be wide for value and wide with bluffs. I think simply by 3betting and calling AJ here we are going to profit almost automatically from his wide opening range. It is really hard for him to combat. I have not used any software or program to figure it out, but you can just imagine if he is opening wide (his stats suggests he is a reg so he prob will) that he will shove and get it in bad sometimes or if not, just give up too often. Either way we are probably profiting. I don't have any history with this guy in particular so I think I prefer calling to keep more of his dominated hands in(not sure if he jams too wide on us with no history). I guess you can call it experience. If someone have software/stats to prove me wrong I would love to see it to better my own play. I guess you could set it up in ICMIZER, but it is hard to know exact ranges without knowing the player too much.

2. You are correct, it does depend on the stack to pot ratio. I am not sure exactly what you mean with your questions. I guess you want to know at which exact point does the pot become big enough to ch/r get it in vs c/c basically. The answer to that is not really easy to give. I would say, if you need a number, if he had about 4x (8k) the pot otf. It gives him enough room to think he has FE, and doesnt make his bluff overly expensive (like now it seems a bit much to shove 13k with say two overs when I make it 2k). 

you are making some good points about why ch/raising can be better at lower spr. One thing I want to add is that he might shove some worse sdv hands than our if we raise, but check back and try to get to showdown if we c/c flop. Talking about AK, A7, 88 etc + potentially some draws.

3. Cool, I like to always get more suggestions on how to make better videos. Hope you enjoyed it :)

The thing with the "MTT" button is that you have to put in tournament considerations. How many players there were left, what average stack was, and total chips in play. It then gives you a more accurate answer with ICM considerations. Problem is I don't have this information now,, you really only have it at the time of play so all I can do is to look at the chip ev of something and if it is only slightly +chip, assume it is probably not good enough to make it. Hope that is good enough of an answer. I know it is sort of vague and you would like exact numbers on every decision, it is just not possible without the info the require you to put in, so Im giving educated guesses. If you do know all these things, you should put it in ofc and get better solutions.

Shoving