EPT London Satellite (part 2)
Posted by Grayson Ramage
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 7 Comments...
1st hand of the video and 1st hand of the final table.
Is villain rly cold 4bet bluffing more than like 10% of the time here ?
If his value range consists of QQ+/AK, cant we just call in position his 4bet just to realise our equity (hit a pair) on the flop or eventually call a tiny cbet instd of getting it in ?
We have barely 40% vs his value range, facing a big stack, with plenty of shortstacks at the table.
Or am i completely missreading the spot and you can expect him to 4bet a merge value range containing TT+/AQ+ ?
I'm not sure how often he will be light there, but I don't think I can completely discount him 6betting light. I also wouldn't expect him to fold 88 or AJ to my 3bet, and I'm not sure what he would do against a 5bet with those hands.
Flatting his 4bet is also a viable option. The fact that there are a lot of shortstacks at the table is less relevant since almost the entire prizepool is paid out to the top 2 spots, so getting into a big pot against another big stack is as detrimental to me.
Hi Grayson, nice video.I'v noticed you like to keep your HUD simple and check pop-ups when needed.I do so myself. How valuable do you think adding lines like Rfi, Stl/FTS, 3b vs Stl/FStl to 3b is ?
All of those numbers can be helpful, I just don't like having my screen more cluttered than it needs to be, although it is possible that it would be more efficient to have a line with that info rather than having to check pop-ups for it. I would recommend trying it out and seeing what works better for you.
Hey Grayson, good video. On the TT hand where you 3bet nur1k, rdcrsn shoves, then nur1ck calls, i think cold calling the shove is way better than folding. At this stage eliminating a player is huge, and I see nur1ck playing passive postflop w/ the dry side pot and dynamic.
You make a good point about nur1ck likely playing passively postflop due to the dry side pot and fact that we are near a satty bubble. If I am never bluffed by nur1ck postflop, it is a clear call in this spot, since I am getting over 3-1 and will have 26% equity if I give rdcrsn a range of 88+, AJ+ and nur1ck a range of JJ+, AK. Obviously, as it turns out, nur1ck's actual range was much wider that this, making it a bad fold with 1010.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.