Fixed, thanks.

Hey thanks, appreciate it a lot!

Yeah tbh, sometimes I felt that the information I presented was a bit too basic, because everyone knows that if a donkbet is weak you should bluffraise a lot. But I think really consistently observing and processing all kinds of information and using that information to find out how your opponent is approaching the game and identifying opportunities to exploit him is something that is waaay more difficult (and hopefully this video series helped to make this a bit easier)

+1 to what Sprince said, especially,

Great series, definitely gonna rewatch from the beginning after the last part and take more notes/try to incorporate the things i've been missing out on, in my own game.

TYVM DjuNKeLL!

my thought is a copy paste of jerseygrinder23 comment

Hah thanks, really appreciate it!!

Yeah, that is pretty much the bottom of my range, and although I've some notes (I didn't check them in-game I believe), I feel without too many reads this is probably better folded. I don't think I would fold 76o/86s though.

This should be pretty obvious, but good aggression means being aggressive in good spots and with good ranges, where bad aggression is just simply being aggressive in bad spots with bad ranges. I think the most important thing that differentiate good aggressive players and bad aggressive players is the logic, thought processes and decision making they apply for their aggression.

Good aggression usually involves a lot of good logic, where bad aggression is just randomly being aggressive just to be aggressive. So for example, good aggressive players know very well when someone is capped and weak and take full advantage of it, where bad aggressive players do it more randomly and based on their own hand strength and because they just like to run big bluffs.

Another thing good aggressive opponents do better is staying observant who is adjusting and who is not, and adjust accordingly, where bad aggressive players are not that flexible and keep being aggressive despite their opposition or change in dynamics.

Also, like you said, bad aggressive opponents are usually very stationary where I think good aggressive players mix up their game very well between making herocalls, but also herofolds. They just analyze the spots they are in much better and know which spots players are under or overbluffing and/or use their reads to decide whether to herocall or herofold.

Mentally good aggressive are also more stabile because even if their aggression didn´t work out, they know their logic was good and think about adjustments to make, where bad aggressive players are more likely to be annoyed and spazz the next time.

This is obviously a generalization and in practice the specifics will differ from player to player - but hopefully this was helpful for you.

Hey,

Sorry for not getting back to you earlier, missed this one.

Yeah you can defininitely be very exploitable here OTT when you get checked to. For example, if you know your opponent if check-folding a ton OTT after cbetting OTF, we can decide to check back strong hands and bet with our bluffs. That way villain might still bluff river vs our strong range as most of villains range for checking OTT is weak. Also by exploitatively checking back turn with made hands villain can river some hands with decent SDV. I think in general it is better to make this kind of play on boards where our opponent isn´t likely to improve that much with most of his range if we check back turn exploitatively (meaning you don't risk that much by giving villain a free card). Example might be having AJ on A522.

I don't know about the delayed cbet stat in PT tbh, I know that HM has it for sure.