I'm sorry you didn't like the series so far. If you can let me know what you didn't like in more detail and/or give suggestions, I can perhaps improve my coming videos.

I can only guess that you're joking?

Hova :
I think it's quite audacious to leave a comment disqualifying the video content without any constructive criticism. After all this video is released to help everyone on this site. If you feel like certain topics / concepts are not addressed in the appropriate manner I would suggest you either do it yourself, or come up with suggestions on how to improve the alleged poor quality of the videos.

@DJUNKELL: I like your videos, I think an exploitative view on the game is very helpful at lower stakes when you don't have to be concerned with balance as much. As most players are probably playing those stakes, you are addressing a large part of the community.
I do have one concern and that is the quality of the presentation slides. It is often hard to hard to understand the slides since you seem to abbreviate most sentences. Maybe there is a way to put a little less content but in more detail (I am not referring to your verbal explanations, those are fine in my opinion) on each slide.

Hey DiamondClub,

I'll do my best to make the powerpoint presentations more effective in the next videos (part 5 will be the same though, I already produced that one).

Hope you are joking. He has put in a lot of work in this series and actually followed up on his word.

Some of the Elite Pros will promise a video series, and it never comes to fruition.

Don't listen to him, I love this series! :)

Thanks a lot! :)

Hey MakeMake,

Thanks for your feedback, appreciate it! I might go over preflop range building in CREV in future videos if people want to see that. Might take a while though as this series will last another few episodes.

Just some raw estimations of what I think is a low/normal/high (same order below) frequency:

WWSF: <48, 48-50, >50
AGGR FREQ RIVER: <28, 28-34, >34
WTSD: <26, 26-30, >30

There can obviously be variance involved in these stats, so that's why I always mix all stats together. For example, if I see tight VPIP/PFR/3BET, low cbet, high checkfold as PFR, low WTSD/WWSF etc, then I can pretty safely assume that my opponent tends to be more a weak/tight opponent type. You can further confirm this read if you have specific notes/tendencies written down, such as missing thin valuebets and not following through with (obvious) river bluffs.

Also, sometimes it is also useful to check the net amount won when evaluating WWSF, river aggression frequency and WTSD. All those stats are related to running hot/bad, so checking for results can be useful if one specific stat seems (very) low/high.

Bottom line is, always try to check and mix all stats and notes you have to figure out what opponent type you're dealing with.

(fwiw, if you want specific defintions of these stats, I recommend checking the HM2 forum)

Thank you for the kind words!