Easy Got Back: Increase Your Winrate
Posted by Dhruv Bhargava
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 4 Comments...
Great review.
4:40 table 2 would the flop be a call if the board weren't paired?
12:20 table 2 that hand has a top and middle gaps and we are facing a raise from utg. To me that hand seems fairly weak to even call much less 3bet. Though, I suppose I would prefer to 3bet before call to iso and take initiative.
18:55 same structure hand as above but now we 4 bet. It seems too weak.
23:47 table 2 are you raising turn based on his bet size being smaller? Should he be polar there?
Thanks!
Hi SoundSpeed, sorry I've been late to respond.
4:40- yes, it would have been a higher EV call if the board weren't paired and if we had multiple door draws.
12:20 I just checked, 3b with the rundown is solver approved; while QT86 is a 3b when ds, QT85 isn't. This means the EV of 3b our hand is close to zero. Go either way but if you're not 3b QT98ds then that's a clear mistake.
18:55- here, it's close for me between 4b and folding. I 4b to isolate and to ensure are suits are (more) live. There are tons of flops for us to bluff or comfortably shove.
23:47- not necessarily as he should be betting trips and full houses for value as well as hands like flush draws or combo draws as semi bluffs. When the board pairs, I like his sizing choice but not the combos he's betting and calling raises with.
nice vid Dhruv, thanks for the vid
you're welcome mx404
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.