20:30 with JJ on the T544T board You mentioned you would call 4 bets with A2s A3s 76s & 87s. You are 3betting these hands CO vs UTG & calling 4 bets? Later in the video 26:50 3bet T9s BTN vs CO and fold to 4bet. Just makes me wonder what bluffs you really have in your range for the JJ hand. I do like the thin value shove and I do think opponent is mostly capped at AXs as you said, just don't think hero has many bluffs in this spot. I think hands like KJs KQs AQs are more likely than the ones you mentioned.
30:30 KQ on KT74 when you over-bet the turn do you find people are calling this bet wide enough? My pool is vastly over folding to these bets! I find it increases my red line, but I am losing out on value (making money) while improving red line. I've become very unbalanced to just using over bets with bluffs and 3/4 sizing with value on these turns instead.
Just wanted to point out that I think your logic is inconsistent here. On turn you justified a raise saying you can set up a pot size shove. Then on the K say that you will bluff this card and check back on blanks because it wins vs xxcc combos.
If you’re going to give up on blank rivers, seems like we would be better served flatting turn and bluffing good rivers(mainly Kx). Our hand as you said has some showdown vs bluffs, and equity/bluff equity vs small pairs. So the turn raise doesn’t really make sense to me unless we are planning to follow thru a lot on rivers to get better hands to fold
so 40%+ of the time still giving up, and 55% time going to find a river barrel/improve. Yeah not sure that is too great, granted the small turn raise doesn't really generate much if any FE, and we will only get to bluff just more like 50% of the time on river, and it may not even be a successful bluff on top of that. So, I think I lean towards a turn call rather than a raise unless I just thought I could punish a capped range and they folded majority of times to a river jam
I'm having difficulty answering a general q so need some help.
Do you think/feel there's any difference between regular tables and zoom? I'm having issues thinking about the dynamic nature of zoom (where -opponents come and go -seat order changes -things are happening in hands you can't view) and I'm finding it confusing.
I'm just looking for some advice to think correctly about this format.
Loading 13 Comments...
28:30 Why are you flatting KTs SB vs BTN 2.5?
20:30 with JJ on the T544T board You mentioned you would call 4 bets with A2s A3s 76s & 87s. You are 3betting these hands CO vs UTG & calling 4 bets? Later in the video 26:50 3bet T9s BTN vs CO and fold to 4bet. Just makes me wonder what bluffs you really have in your range for the JJ hand. I do like the thin value shove and I do think opponent is mostly capped at AXs as you said, just don't think hero has many bluffs in this spot. I think hands like KJs KQs AQs are more likely than the ones you mentioned.
30:30 KQ on KT74 when you over-bet the turn do you find people are calling this bet wide enough? My pool is vastly over folding to these bets! I find it increases my red line, but I am losing out on value (making money) while improving red line. I've become very unbalanced to just using over bets with bluffs and 3/4 sizing with value on these turns instead.
What win rate do you have on 100NL?
KTs: I only have a flat range when I have good reads on the BB(or a weaker BB)
JJ: Yes if I 3b those hands, I will call the 4b if they 4b enough. But a lot of people are not 4betting enough----> we could masive overfold pre
KQ, yes agree I play higher limits, but it on 100NL 3/4 might be higher ev
I have a 8,5bb winrate on 100Z but sample is small 120k hands over last 2 years.
for 100NL for 120k hands, I assume 200NL is your main game then? 120k hands is like a month of zoom....
AQo on the 3388 turn facing lead:
Just wanted to point out that I think your logic is inconsistent here. On turn you justified a raise saying you can set up a pot size shove. Then on the K say that you will bluff this card and check back on blanks because it wins vs xxcc combos.
If you’re going to give up on blank rivers, seems like we would be better served flatting turn and bluffing good rivers(mainly Kx). Our hand as you said has some showdown vs bluffs, and equity/bluff equity vs small pairs. So the turn raise doesn’t really make sense to me unless we are planning to follow thru a lot on rivers to get better hands to fold
Which minute is it?
7:20 ish
Yes I like to bluff most river, unless its an 2-7
so 40%+ of the time still giving up, and 55% time going to find a river barrel/improve. Yeah not sure that is too great, granted the small turn raise doesn't really generate much if any FE, and we will only get to bluff just more like 50% of the time on river, and it may not even be a successful bluff on top of that. So, I think I lean towards a turn call rather than a raise unless I just thought I could punish a capped range and they folded majority of times to a river jam
I didn't follow this hand either. The small turn raise achieves nothing and just feels like spew to me.
Hey dekkers
I'm having difficulty answering a general q so need some help.
Do you think/feel there's any difference between regular tables and zoom? I'm having issues thinking about the dynamic nature of zoom (where -opponents come and go -seat order changes -things are happening in hands you can't view) and I'm finding it confusing.
I'm just looking for some advice to think correctly about this format.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.