I do agree with 27:00 being a pretty under-bluffed spot. I probably would have gotten curious and called just because there's a 5 liner out there and a lot of the time we are chopping.
Hey Dekkers Noob question here at timestamp 1:29 you were explaining how you do not like 4 betting KJ in these positions UTG vs MP because people are really tight in these positions, would you be more inclined to 4 bet KJ against a BTN 3-bet? or would you still like to use hands like KQ and AQ that have better blockers.
Timestamp 37:18 the last hand, You mentioned that it was a tight fold but explained that you prefer to call with hands like AQ here because it has more equity against his bluffs and value hands, I understand that AQ would have more equity against his value hands but against his bluffs? I thought that 66 would have more equity against his bluffs than A high? Do you just end up giving him credit for a 10x hand that has hit the turn? or do you feel that if we call with 66 here we are calling with all under pairs here and that it is too much? Please let me know what you think
Yes I like KQ AQ more blockerwise. But most important is that UTG-BU most people do add more bluffs to their 3b range. So our 4b bluff will work more often-------> I am not going to under 4b bluff vs most people.
Loading 7 Comments...
I do agree with 27:00 being a pretty under-bluffed spot. I probably would have gotten curious and called just because there's a 5 liner out there and a lot of the time we are chopping.
9min in any reason why you folded KQsuited to a UTG+1 std raise?
Indeed, should be a call/3b. It was a misclick for sure:)
thx! just wondering haha. love the vids
Hey Dekkers Noob question here at timestamp 1:29 you were explaining how you do not like 4 betting KJ in these positions UTG vs MP because people are really tight in these positions, would you be more inclined to 4 bet KJ against a BTN 3-bet? or would you still like to use hands like KQ and AQ that have better blockers.
Timestamp 37:18 the last hand, You mentioned that it was a tight fold but explained that you prefer to call with hands like AQ here because it has more equity against his bluffs and value hands, I understand that AQ would have more equity against his value hands but against his bluffs? I thought that 66 would have more equity against his bluffs than A high? Do you just end up giving him credit for a 10x hand that has hit the turn? or do you feel that if we call with 66 here we are calling with all under pairs here and that it is too much? Please let me know what you think
Yes I like KQ AQ more blockerwise. But most important is that UTG-BU most people do add more bluffs to their 3b range. So our 4b bluff will work more often-------> I am not going to under 4b bluff vs most people.
37:18 I do think his most obvious bluffs are A4s A5s(maybe KQ KJs type of hands) with 66 he has better odds than against a hand like AQo.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.