$100 Zoom: Pool Tendencies and Exploitative Bet Sizes
Posted by Dekkers
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 13 Comments...
Dekkers nice video again. Can you make a replayer video on 3 bet pots? Discuss position ranges and 3 bet ranges?
@ 11min mark you assign a 20% range to UTG player who is playing 21/17. Do you think this is realistic? I think it greatly impacts the pio sim you did when you include 22+ and other hands like 76s+ 86s+ from UTG. This 985hh board should favor BB range a lot more imo given tighter opening ranges vs utg. Also did you realize guy had 99 and you 1 outted him? You seemed very unemotional about it.
Are you showing profit with smaller SCs and 22-44 UTG? I noticed in elite videos they are folding T9s and below & 22-44 UTG, but opening 76s+ / 44+ from MP. If they are folding these hands where rake is less of an impact, I would think opening these hands at 100NL would be even a bigger mistake. Yes, player pool is weaker, but would really like to see a data base that is showing profit with these hands. Seems like unnecessary variance.
As you see I am not winning with those hands with opening. Sample size is 1k hands, but still it tells us somethings. So yea good one, on a lot of tables folding makes sense!
Dekkers There was a video by Julian for full ring couple years ago where he analyzed this type of stuff. Showing which hands are winning / losing by position. Would be cool if you could make a similar series, showing preflop ranges and hands that are winning / losing. Many of us watch all videos here on runitonce and often mix up higher stakes and lower stakes. Recently bought a course that shows 65s+ and 44+ from utg range. Quite surprising how many of these hands are losing but are still in people's ranges.
great video first of all
second, usually you write the higher nominated card first . e.g
T9s , 65s etc etc.
i think you can't assume he's not value shoving sets the last hands . obviously you have pretty much none of the sets yourself, your percieved range is largely skewed to overpairs and therefore sets are an easy shove.
having said that, i don't know if we can assume he has no bluffs here, and TT does block T9. but i guess i would still fold here. tough runout and that's it
I agree. He is shoving sets for value there all day long. Dont see a reason not to.
Hi i liked the video.
On the final hand analysis you assign villain 1 combo of 56s why not 3 combos?
Because I dont think he is playing a hand that way till river 100% of the time. So my assumption is that he plays it 33% of the time this way .
hi,. what are the main advantages of 3betting larger these days i see players 3 betting 4.5x to 6x the raise whats the benefits of this. thank.
benefit is we get more Fold equity preflop. But post flop his range will be stronger----> we can put less presure. Overall I dont think you gain much more value (maybe nothing more )
Your Videos are way better than Peter Clarke's.
Thank you!
Hello Dekker. Re: 55 hand at 10 mins. Your (PIO) defence range is way too tight for BB v EP - 2.3x. Is this due to lack of rake back on Stars?
24 mins Q6. I don't think you can fold turn especially vs small size. Pool already overfolds to delay cbets BBvBU and but can use plenty of Ax or small PPs for delay range.
Hi dekkers
1)on the last hand you gave villain 9 value combos and said you need 36% equity to call you forgot to give villain a5s
2) you said you would only need to find 3 bluff combos( assuming hes not jamming any sets-which is a big assumption-) but wouldn't you need to find 17 bluff combos to make it a 0ev call?
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.