@10:30 Table 3, D 3B AKo vs CO unknown player who initially called MP Raise and then called your D 3B, on Flop 964r, you recommend 1/2 pot CBet for more fold equity vs unknown player.
Versus Regular player would you be more inclined to bet 1/3 pot?
Do you really think ATs is too weak to defend in the CO to a 3bet from the SB?? I thought that was a pretty standard call there? SB is usually playing a 3bet or fold strat and 3betting a 12% linear range. ATs has almost 45% equity against a 10% linear range here and we have position.
vs unkonw opp the default is to fold,unless later you have enough reason to call(hand history)
and you are saying 12%,which is not bad at sb, vs whom it's enough for us to 4bet or call ,when sb 3b vs co is over 10%. but usually it's not that high.sb bb vs btn makes it looks over 10%
kjo is the bottom of my calling range here if sb vs co is tight like to 7%
I think what I meant in the video is we should be careful vs who we don't know and they dont eigher,unless there are more histories for both of us to play agg vs each other
And thank your for your comment and question to make the spot more clearer than I made in the video
@30.40 - you open AQ in HJ and fold to a btn 3bet. I couldn't see the specific 3bet stats but villain looks like a 21/17/8 and possibly 3bet% on btn is 4.5%. I figure we aren't doing to well against a 4.5% range OOP, but if we are folding this, wouldnt this be a good combo to turn into a bluff? Or do you not have a bluff range against these type of villains? If not, what does your defending range look like in this spot?
the samples are not enough,so aq here ,all 3 options is okey ,fold call or 4b.
but I will def call aqs ako aks jj tt here,I don't think I will bluff vs 4.5%,unless the hhs are more
@3:22 Table 1 - seeing as you raised 77 when you turned a set in a very similar spot later on in the video (@6:30) would 67 not be a good candidate to bluff as it is pretty close to the bottom of our range and has gutshot outs. If not what hands would you use to bluff here and if the 5 was a 5s would that then make 67ss one of your bluffing hands?
@47:00 Table 2 - after the hand where he shows down A2o you say that his play is standard and good. Personally I would use the suited combos of Ax rather than offsuit hands but I could be persuaded otherwise. What I really wanted to ask was about the river call - given that you're polarized aren't there better hands in his range that can call? A5 seems an obvious one as it blocks 55 combos, assuming you're betting Tx at this sizing too (Not too sure this is true, would you be able to clarify?) Then calling Tx hands will block those combos, especially hands like T9/T8 which block your Tx but don't block your QJ, KJ hands like KT/QT/JT would. Am I putting too much weight into blocker effects here?
67 I think it's close between to call and to fold,as I think actually we are not reping much on a rainbow board,the fold equity is always not high at this situation.and people are more sensitive on a backdoor now,so I am not bluffing more than calling with 67ss on 5s turn actually.
a2o is not a mistake when we choose to 3b bluff vs sb,although it's on a wild side action.
I think u are puttong too much weight on blockers situation like this .
the main reason for him do call down almost 100% with a top pair ,is his checking back on the flop,although the river size is not happy to call...... but vs 50%-100% psb, it's a snap here.
think I am bluffing here with most of my hands without sd value like 67s
Why did you 3bet to $3 with the KK vs cutoff 3bb open, then later on the same stack depths you 3bet to $10 vs a 2.5bb open in the same positions with AKo?
Are you just going bigger because you don't want to encourage a call as much with AK as with KK?
@22:25 you say KJo is too weak to 3b against Isolation raise, but how about a call and play it postflop? just folding seems kinda nitty to me, or do you think the isolation-raises on nl100 zoom are so tight?
Hey,
In a previous comment posted about folding the AQo from HJ vs the BTN 3bet of 4.5%, you mentioned that you would definitely call with AQs AK JJ TT. Does that mean you are 4bet/calling QQ? How high does the opponent 3bet have to be for you to 4bet/call with AK?
Loading 17 Comments...
@10:30 Table 3, D 3B AKo vs CO unknown player who initially called MP Raise and then called your D 3B, on Flop 964r, you recommend 1/2 pot CBet for more fold equity vs unknown player.
Versus Regular player would you be more inclined to bet 1/3 pot?
yes I think so
@12:30, Table 2 UTG fold K9s with comments that it is too loose unless weaker player in Blinds. Also Pokerstars rake too high.
What UTG raise percentage standard conditions do you recommend at Pokerstars 100NL?
I think it's around 13%( tighter side)-15% utg is standard
Do you really think ATs is too weak to defend in the CO to a 3bet from the SB?? I thought that was a pretty standard call there? SB is usually playing a 3bet or fold strat and 3betting a 12% linear range. ATs has almost 45% equity against a 10% linear range here and we have position.
vs unkonw opp the default is to fold,unless later you have enough reason to call(hand history)
and you are saying 12%,which is not bad at sb, vs whom it's enough for us to 4bet or call ,when sb 3b vs co is over 10%. but usually it's not that high.sb bb vs btn makes it looks over 10%
kjo is the bottom of my calling range here if sb vs co is tight like to 7%
I think what I meant in the video is we should be careful vs who we don't know and they dont eigher,unless there are more histories for both of us to play agg vs each other
And thank your for your comment and question to make the spot more clearer than I made in the video
So you're saying on this particular spot (unknown villain) ATs works better as 4bet/fold than call?
@30.40 - you open AQ in HJ and fold to a btn 3bet. I couldn't see the specific 3bet stats but villain looks like a 21/17/8 and possibly 3bet% on btn is 4.5%. I figure we aren't doing to well against a 4.5% range OOP, but if we are folding this, wouldnt this be a good combo to turn into a bluff? Or do you not have a bluff range against these type of villains? If not, what does your defending range look like in this spot?
the samples are not enough,so aq here ,all 3 options is okey ,fold call or 4b.
but I will def call aqs ako aks jj tt here,I don't think I will bluff vs 4.5%,unless the hhs are more
@3:22 Table 1 - seeing as you raised 77 when you turned a set in a very similar spot later on in the video (@6:30) would 67 not be a good candidate to bluff as it is pretty close to the bottom of our range and has gutshot outs. If not what hands would you use to bluff here and if the 5 was a 5s would that then make 67ss one of your bluffing hands?
@47:00 Table 2 - after the hand where he shows down A2o you say that his play is standard and good. Personally I would use the suited combos of Ax rather than offsuit hands but I could be persuaded otherwise. What I really wanted to ask was about the river call - given that you're polarized aren't there better hands in his range that can call? A5 seems an obvious one as it blocks 55 combos, assuming you're betting Tx at this sizing too (Not too sure this is true, would you be able to clarify?) Then calling Tx hands will block those combos, especially hands like T9/T8 which block your Tx but don't block your QJ, KJ hands like KT/QT/JT would. Am I putting too much weight into blocker effects here?
Thanks!
67 I think it's close between to call and to fold,as I think actually we are not reping much on a rainbow board,the fold equity is always not high at this situation.and people are more sensitive on a backdoor now,so I am not bluffing more than calling with 67ss on 5s turn actually.
a2o is not a mistake when we choose to 3b bluff vs sb,although it's on a wild side action.
I think u are puttong too much weight on blockers situation like this .
the main reason for him do call down almost 100% with a top pair ,is his checking back on the flop,although the river size is not happy to call...... but vs 50%-100% psb, it's a snap here.
think I am bluffing here with most of my hands without sd value like 67s
Hi,
Why did you 3bet to $3 with the KK vs cutoff 3bb open, then later on the same stack depths you 3bet to $10 vs a 2.5bb open in the same positions with AKo?
Are you just going bigger because you don't want to encourage a call as much with AK as with KK?
making more folding equity with bigger size,oop ako not easy to play vs good player once no hit
@22:25 you say KJo is too weak to 3b against Isolation raise, but how about a call and play it postflop? just folding seems kinda nitty to me, or do you think the isolation-raises on nl100 zoom are so tight?
hey ,3x iso we can call here ,4x,sio I will call here with kts kjs+
Hey,
In a previous comment posted about folding the AQo from HJ vs the BTN 3bet of 4.5%, you mentioned that you would definitely call with AQs AK JJ TT. Does that mean you are 4bet/calling QQ? How high does the opponent 3bet have to be for you to 4bet/call with AK?
Thanks in advance!
suck spot for 4b callling with qq,but I have to do it sometimes even though they are tight
7%plus including lot's of light 3bs,so ak def a 4b here
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.