@51:00 i think that another reason you are mixing between bet and x back with combos such as 77 with the 7c is so that your range remains balanced with the correct value:bluff ratio. if you just bet all if your club combos as the IP player then we would have to start turning more hands such as weaker Qx etc in to bluffs, hands that already have some EV as a x down as they beat the OOP players random turn stabs. if your range contained too many thin value bets then of course we could get exploited by the OOP player simply x folding with all of his bluff catchers like 2 pairs etc.
Great video could you explain a little on the not defending at MDF on river in the 77 hand on PIO. Is it due to the fact that on previous streets our bluffs are in fact value hands ( when we get folds ?) I am a little lost with it. Thanks a lot.
If I'm not mistaken the OOP player is starting by folding all of its literal 0 equity hands first, and then trying to reach MDF within a set of hands that's relevant to defend. This happens when the aggressive range is linear (due to calling a turn bet) and the defense range still contains air hands (bluffs from turn that gave up river). OOP is playing defense within a set of hands that contains stuff worse than the worst bluffs IP can come up with.
The main thing is that IP paid to get to the river, so didn't get to this spot for free. Generally, a bluff should be worth ~0, but here since I had to call a turn bet to even get a river bluffing opportunity, it's OK that the bluff is profitable since I "paid" for the opportunity on the previous street. Does that make sense?
7:30 - were you mixing raise on flop/turn to get it in?
19:10 - any particular info that leads to jam here or are we never folding w this stack distribution?
7:30 - yeah, i'll mix in some raises but probably at a fairly low frequency. My hand is not going to get drawn out on too often by anything that folds, and stacks are shallow enough that I have no issues getting it in if I don't raise.
19:10 - wouldn't really look to fold a suited broadways here ~ever. So default is definitely to shove, I guess they are super nitty I might consider something else, but would be rare.
Hi Daniel, Really enjoyed the content of this video.
38:56- you mention the theory video “the cost of betting small” / “the cost of not betting big” referring to the flop type with the T7s hand. I was unable to find this video. Does it secretly yet have another title than the ones you mentioned.
Where can I find it?
Loading 12 Comments...
Always great!
Thanks Daniel
waiting for the next ones (:
thanks!
@51:00 i think that another reason you are mixing between bet and x back with combos such as 77 with the 7c is so that your range remains balanced with the correct value:bluff ratio. if you just bet all if your club combos as the IP player then we would have to start turning more hands such as weaker Qx etc in to bluffs, hands that already have some EV as a x down as they beat the OOP players random turn stabs. if your range contained too many thin value bets then of course we could get exploited by the OOP player simply x folding with all of his bluff catchers like 2 pairs etc.
Great video could you explain a little on the not defending at MDF on river in the 77 hand on PIO. Is it due to the fact that on previous streets our bluffs are in fact value hands ( when we get folds ?) I am a little lost with it. Thanks a lot.
If I'm not mistaken the OOP player is starting by folding all of its literal 0 equity hands first, and then trying to reach MDF within a set of hands that's relevant to defend. This happens when the aggressive range is linear (due to calling a turn bet) and the defense range still contains air hands (bluffs from turn that gave up river). OOP is playing defense within a set of hands that contains stuff worse than the worst bluffs IP can come up with.
The main thing is that IP paid to get to the river, so didn't get to this spot for free. Generally, a bluff should be worth ~0, but here since I had to call a turn bet to even get a river bluffing opportunity, it's OK that the bluff is profitable since I "paid" for the opportunity on the previous street. Does that make sense?
7:30 - were you mixing raise on flop/turn to get it in?
19:10 - any particular info that leads to jam here or are we never folding w this stack distribution?
thanks for the content!
7:30 - yeah, i'll mix in some raises but probably at a fairly low frequency. My hand is not going to get drawn out on too often by anything that folds, and stacks are shallow enough that I have no issues getting it in if I don't raise.
19:10 - wouldn't really look to fold a suited broadways here ~ever. So default is definitely to shove, I guess they are super nitty I might consider something else, but would be rare.
Hey Daniel, What's with the 2nd pair fold OTT at 8:00 at top left w 86ss? Feels like this has to be worth more than 0?
Hi Daniel, Really enjoyed the content of this video.
38:56- you mention the theory video “the cost of betting small” / “the cost of not betting big” referring to the flop type with the T7s hand. I was unable to find this video. Does it secretly yet have another title than the ones you mentioned.
Where can I find it?
if SB bets big 75% or overbet on RIVER dont we have a tough bluff catching
decision with 7c flush ? easy call/ easy fold or mix ?
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.