I think this is reasonable with the view that population is never folding Qx+ but often folding weaker stuff regardless of sizing. It would also allow the betting of more Qx hands in theory too.

Thanks, I find this is one of the more common types of tilt at the microstakes.

Is that you? I'll let Cem know to be afraid.

Mental game work is very often a matrer of the player conquering the beast within. The hardest thing to control is our own subconsious mind and sadly he's the guy that likes to tilt.

I agree :-)

Thanks for the feedback and I agree. We will try to move faster in future installments of the series.

Audio should be permanelty fixed on videos now. I've made a few upgrades to my set up.

Great idea!

This is a huge question and would probably take a book to answer properly. I would say a few of the most common ones would be betting for poor reasons at an EV loss, not protecting an OOP checking range on the flop and failing to find good spots to overfold your range. The fixes for these are to get better at poker!

I think you need a better explanation or provide evidence on why he is wrong. I thought he explained it well that the villan has an uncapped range, making us lose a ton of money to nutted hands and getting few calls from worse hands. But if you can prove with calculations, I would be interested in seeing.

Having an overbet range is correct. It occurs roughly a 20% freq (never with this hand) in a strategy where you check 70% range oop on this board (where co range although less nutted is also less diluted). Implementing a strategy with 3 sizings vs population might be overkill. In my UTG vs button sims similar flop after cbetting 30% freq we overbet AJ JJ 66 and mix AA with mostly checking and some blocking. AK is mostly a block and checking 30%. AQ always a check.

Starting off with a rangebet our turn betting freq will be like 10-15% using an overbet strategy (my guess). So if you start off flop with even a moderate cbet freq and want to valuebet AQ+ for over half pot on the turn having no overbets makes sense.
If you listen to what peter says he is more so building a justifiable fairly optimal strategy around the hand in question. The main takeaway Is regardless of strat AK is never an overbet. And most likely if you want to bet AQ for value after a flop range bet most of your sets are going to want to find themselves either protecting our checks (AA) or protecting our 2/3 sizing.

i was not saying that particular hand was overbet on turn.. i was just saying that you should have overbet range on that turn :)

I'd say its a big assumption villain is bet calling AA and AK on that river with a high frequency.