Will keep that in mind for next part

The key to success in a low buy in big field event is not in balanced play, there are absolutely spots where you can make an any two cards play. those spots exist in higher buy ins too just in more rare situations

That particular hand btw wasn't a great spot though I'm not saying that was a great play, it was very speculative based on a small sample. However the 3bet was cheap and the play didn't affect me in any way, it's good to test out opponents from time to time and set a tone of aggression. It has positive side effects such that players fold more to you, you get to steal more etc.

a spot like bb defense Deep in the game is going to be very frequent and here I find the "Theory" choice meaning going according to pio, much Closer to actually correct and more often than us going wider than pio suggests to exploit, we rather want to go even tighter being out of Position and not being able to Play as nicely as pio postlfop. Thats why here i find the ranges from pio very helpful. There is simply a higher average Degree of uncertainty, ranges postflop are much wider, we dont know how often our Opponent cbets and Barrels and how he constructs his range exactly, we will be out of position etc. This will have the biggest Impact on certain lower effective stacksizes.
A spot where I decide to become aggressive with a completely random Hand like in this case, happens very infrequenty. Again stacksize implications are very important as well as Risk reward Ratio. When the Risk is so low that a certain Play literally doesnt affect us at all if it goes wrong (like here there would have been very few boards on which id have gone all in at any Point and even if we did, the Damage would not have been very dramatical). When the Risk is extremely low and the frequency of which we take the spot is very low as well, the Plays can become more and more speculative .
As far as your Analysis About what Hands to 3bet with on shortstacks goes, of Course you are absolutely Right there, im Always stretching that Point that blocker type Hands become more and more important on shortstacks, whether for opens or 3bets. We def want to expand our bluffing range in the blocker area first. But im sorry this just does not apply to any possible given Scenario in nlh tournaments...and some spots are just such potential marginal mistakes, that it doesnt really matter to take one misstep or not, and im Always rather the one to make a mistake and look stupid, find out more About how my opponents react in certain spots and find out more About myself, than to Always stay in line.
Again, the Hand itself is still absolutely debatable, def true low sample, def true good Chance we are making a mistake there. But tbh it's just not that important in this unique Situation and Comes with some side future ev benefits.
Ive been playing tournaments for a very Long time and thats just the way i Approach them, I will never stick to any strategy i go from Hand to Hand. I guess I am the wrong Person to watch Videos from for you but good News is there are many others. You are not the only one, there are many regs who have issues with how im playing and that is fine with me. Im not telling anyone how to Play and i dont let anyone tell me how to Play, to me all that matters is how i feel i played at the end of the day and the Long term success.

In the future though I will Focus more on presentation type Videos and mostly on mindset. My demo Video for runitonce was actually such a Video and i put alot of Energy into it, for some reason i thought this would be posted as well. Then i did this one Right away after and have to say here i was lacking a bit of Energy, i could have explained some of my General Outlook on the game a bit more first to introduce myself so think i didnt do as great a Job here for my first Video. The next Video ill first do something else before i finish this hh and in the future it will be less hh review types. My Point of view is that every Player has to become good by himself and not through others anyways, i rather want to inpsire that than telling Players how to Play strategies.

thanks man, yes I meant Txhh indeed and not pure Th you are right about that, single heart tx he does not want to have in his calling range, in fact he shouldnt call any ten anymore on the turn other than maybe QT, i dont think he should even call T8 or maybe here T8 without a heart as you say is better and then fold T8 with a heart. But I have to say im not certain even, its a multi way pot that also includes icm so its not a spot we can just put into a solver. But we have a very short stack there in sb, if we put this into the solver pretending its heads up it can give some good guideline. I just put it in will let it run and post the results here. That is with icm. Sizings for flop and turn i just used one sizing and thats the sizings i used here to simplify, on such a drawy board with us having more nuts than opponent in our range (i didnt assume opponent limps a hand like 87o much here or Q9o, KQo i gave him just a tiny bit etc) the solver i can imagine also or even predominantly wants to have a big sizing on flop. But to get the results for as played i keep it like that

also when i nodelocked for opponent folding small pairs and Ax offsuit up to A7o vs the donklead on the flop, we are then donkleading 95% of the time on flop

thanks glad to hear that man. Working on the next one. Will be an intermediate video (powerpoint video) before i finish this scoop final table

def possible, I was thinking though with the ICM pressure/big money up top even the players as you describe them will become money scared and make more folds. Also I do think my 3bet really was a bit TOO small here indeed. As I said before though I dont have a strong opinion on my play here anyways, totally possible I just spewed a bit of ev there, but with my stack and chip position it isnt that big a deal.
I am aware of low buy in mtt play though, actually most of my career volume still comes from those games, its only last few years where i didnt play them as much anymore.

that would indeed be an annoying spot, I think we should actually even fold then. However im still fine with betting because its a spot in which our opponent super seldomly will jam esp with us having the ace of diamonds. Because of the icm situation opponent is in, i think its more important that we keep betting there to maximize foldequity, as opposed to being worried about some low frequency scenarios that will be bad for us.