Glad to hear you enjoyed the video. Variance mainly. C-Bet stats are normally going to depend on my rolls over small samples and what type of situations I happen to find myself in. My overall c-bet stat is around 50-55% these days.
7:45 HJ opens, co calls, hero squeeze BTN, HJ folds, CO calls. Flop Jc9s6s I am curious about this check back because it appears to cap your range against a pretty pocket heavy range CO will have here. The solve I am looking at only checks 13% of it's range on this texture. Are you looking to bet KsQx / KxQs and check your non spade combos? I would assume a lot of JX and QQ+ want to bet on this dynamic texture. Can you elaborate on this check a bit more besides you don't want to get jammed on?
During the video you mention using deviations to maximize EV. How come you do not mix your sizing preflop being 2.25 most positions, 2.5 btn, and 3bb sb. Do you not mix preflop sizing based on HUD stats of the player? There was a hand where MP opened 2.5, you 3bet 99 CO 7.5, but MP was playing around a 45 vpip! Would be a spot I would just size up to around 9bb.
7:45 - Not sure why this action with this hand implies that my checking range is capped. But in any case, capping our range is fine in many situations in theory - there really shouldn't be any automatic negative association with having a depolarised range. Here though, I don't think it's very relevant whether our range is capped or not. I'm just trying to maximise the EV of my hand. At this SPR vs a weaker player, if we bet medium equity hands like this one, we will suffer the EV ruining branch of investing money to realise no equity when Villain jams. Checking figures to be comfortably higher EV here for this reason.
I might make sizing adjustment occasionally, but it's not that normal for me to have reliable samples on recreational. I think the more important exploit is opening more hands whenever we think there'll be an EV swing in our favour based on the table composition.
Also that concept about checking again to weaker players/fish, (whatever you want to call )them after they cap their range on a previous street is awesome. That's worth the price right there.
Loading 18 Comments...
23:30 folding 33 on 992dd vs halfpot std or distracted?
Oops not sure what happened here. This is a continue of some sort 100% of the time.
Through the session your CB on flop was under 50, is that normal for your usual 6max cash strategy?
Thanks for the great content!
Glad to hear you enjoyed the video. Variance mainly. C-Bet stats are normally going to depend on my rolls over small samples and what type of situations I happen to find myself in. My overall c-bet stat is around 50-55% these days.
7:45 HJ opens, co calls, hero squeeze BTN, HJ folds, CO calls. Flop Jc9s6s I am curious about this check back because it appears to cap your range against a pretty pocket heavy range CO will have here. The solve I am looking at only checks 13% of it's range on this texture. Are you looking to bet KsQx / KxQs and check your non spade combos? I would assume a lot of JX and QQ+ want to bet on this dynamic texture. Can you elaborate on this check a bit more besides you don't want to get jammed on?
During the video you mention using deviations to maximize EV. How come you do not mix your sizing preflop being 2.25 most positions, 2.5 btn, and 3bb sb. Do you not mix preflop sizing based on HUD stats of the player? There was a hand where MP opened 2.5, you 3bet 99 CO 7.5, but MP was playing around a 45 vpip! Would be a spot I would just size up to around 9bb.
Looking forward to more exploitative videos.
7:45 - Not sure why this action with this hand implies that my checking range is capped. But in any case, capping our range is fine in many situations in theory - there really shouldn't be any automatic negative association with having a depolarised range. Here though, I don't think it's very relevant whether our range is capped or not. I'm just trying to maximise the EV of my hand. At this SPR vs a weaker player, if we bet medium equity hands like this one, we will suffer the EV ruining branch of investing money to realise no equity when Villain jams. Checking figures to be comfortably higher EV here for this reason.
I might make sizing adjustment occasionally, but it's not that normal for me to have reliable samples on recreational. I think the more important exploit is opening more hands whenever we think there'll be an EV swing in our favour based on the table composition.
That's a lovely plant you have in the background. What's the name of it? I'm looking to add another plant to my residence similar to yours.
Cheers
Thanks! I love it too. It's a ficus of some description.
Great vid , at about 2min in you refer to a recent vid you made The Tier System is this yet to be released? or am i missing something? cheers!
These have been released in a different order it seems. We had a few technical issues which caused a delay in my videos coming out.
Curious what HUD stats you choose to utilize in this environment.
Thanks!
HUDs are overrated - I mainly use them to get a vague idea of who the player is so mostly VPIP/PFR 3Bet CBet-Flop
Totally agree, just always curious what folks choose to utilize. Thx
Yes please more exploitative videos
Tell Galfond to release the Holdem version of Vision sooner lolz
Nice video. Exploitative live videos are always welcome, especially if you enjoy making them.
Great video.
I think you clicked your mouse at least 10,000 times :-)
Also that concept about checking again to weaker players/fish, (whatever you want to call )them after they cap their range on a previous street is awesome. That's worth the price right there.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.