awesome!

The content of the video is really good, so thanks for that. But I feel like the format could be improved a little bit, maybe a 2 part series to make it less dense and also to allow you to go slower. You could also select a few HHs to review and show how this appllies to real life poker

great video

would love to see how the flop translates to the turn and river with and without a range advantage.

On the flop with a range advantage we frequently bet 1.2x with our polar portion and .3x the remainder. Without the range advantage we check most of the time and when we do bet use the small size. How do both of these type of ranges proceed on the turn and then river?

1) when we bet 1.2x and .3x with our range OOp with an advantage, what do we do with each of these portions on turn and then river.

2) when we have the disadvantage checking 70% and betting .3x what is our bet frequency and size after being called on the turn. Do we bet even less, and if so how drastically?

Nice video! Some of the results seem a bit counter-intuitive and might require turn/river play to justify. Maybe you have some insights that can enlighten us?

ON THE FLOP
1. With an SPR of 10 on the static board we see the preferred sizing being 120% pot. 3 street GGOP sizing here is 89%. On a static board where ranges are relatively polar I would expect a preference for the 80% bet size given your betting abstractions since this is closer to GGOP?
2. With an SPR of 10 on the drawy board we see the preferred sizing being 33% or 50%. This is a lot less than GGOP sizing. I would expect a preference for a larger bet size than GGOP given that ranges are less static so we want to charge draws now?

Great video !
Probably the only video on RIO which covers this crucially important topic. And extremely well presented.
One request I have if you could make a video explaining the concepts of this video mathematically that would be extremely useful .
Thanks again :)