Out Now
×

$500 Zoom: It's Been a Very Long Time Since I've Played Poker

Posted by

You’re watching:

$500 Zoom: It's Been a Very Long Time Since I've Played Poker

user avatar

Sauce123

Elite Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

$500 Zoom: It's Been a Very Long Time Since I've Played Poker

user avatar

Sauce123

POSTED Nov 13, 2020

Fresh off the birth of his daughter, Ben Sulsky fires up two tables of $500 Zoom for the first time in a while and looks to shake the rust off discussing his thought process as he rips through hands.

19 Comments

Loading 19 Comments...

dejankal 4 years, 4 months ago

10:05 QJ think he should look more for suited Ax blockers as you arent supposed to call offsuit ax so harts seem to unblock bluffs better

Sauce123 4 years, 4 months ago

Good point! Maybe I should have peeled here with a fairly high frequency optimally but it's a spot that'll tend to be underbluffed a lot and my hand is near 0EV

RunItTw1ce 4 years, 4 months ago

17:40 Ever consider turning this hand into a bluff ?

Demondoink 4 years, 4 months ago

we might prefer having the Ah instead. cos this completely unblocks IP's bluffs (he can always bluff Jh/Thx combos, such as J9o etc, but will never bluff any Ahx combos) and will thus increase our fold equity when we jam.

also, if we are to raise non all in, then we can also get re-bluffed occasionally if he over values his Ah blocker. this is a small factor, but i think still a relevant one. definitely at deeper stacks it is anyways. tbh i'm unsure if we simply jam all of our flushes, or have 2 sizings otr- one for weaker flushes and the other for stronger ones. cos i think by the river, IP is probably not even able to bet 2 pairs for value, with perhaps even some hands such as AA doing a poor job blocking bluff catchers and unblocking flushes for the bb. i'm unsure though, perhaps all sets are still able to v bet. but even if IP bets all sets+ for value, that doesn't mean a hand such as 54hh is able to value jam. which is why i kinda thought we may have a smaller sizing, to get calls from some frequency of sets/straights without a heart etc and not just jam and allow him to fold these hands and only call flushes himself, or JTo with a heart.

kinda rambling at this point, but just thinking out loud. guess the only way is to sim the hand otr, but i just finished grinding and its 1am so i am not in the mood to do so haha :P

RunItTw1ce 4 years, 4 months ago

also, if we are to raise non all in, then we can also get re-bluffed
occasionally if he over values his Ah blocker.

Over Ah combos is ok since hero only has 2nd pair. Good point on removing Jh/Th blockers though from villains bluffing range. I would say if hero does have AhXx he might have too much SDV to bluff here. If Sauce thinks KxJh is a pure bluff catcher here, would think AhX falls into same category with some potential bluff possibilities.

I do like having two sizes here on the river. Even if it's just like 2.2x or shove. I don't play 500z, but I would still expect people to call with sets and 2 pairs vs small raise given the price and don't expect them to 3 bet bluff much without a ton of $ behind. Just my opinion though, I don't play in that pool.

Thanks for the feed back Demondoink

ctrlplay 4 years, 4 months ago

I ran this spot twice. The first time with forced oop check/IP 30% cbet. When that occurs, villain should be pretty passive on the turn, and 88h seems like a clear check on the river.

The 2nd run, I only forced oop check on the flop, and then IP with options of 30%, 55%, and 100% cbets, checks back 28% on the flop, 88h bets 60% of the time, and ~85% on the turn, and then gives up on the river.

I think that there are some regs that are 100% cbetting this flop for a small size and then overbluff the turn in this spot compared to gto. Against a gto villain, KsJh needs to fold some of the time on the river, and more often vs the 100% flop cbet strat because of the turn passivity. (2nd run below)

River raise strategy with a heart

Jeff_ 4 years, 4 months ago

congratulations. you don't seem rusty at all
6-47 2nd table w 55. Thats looks like incredible line, vs small x/R he needs to defend likely almost 80% of his range (i didnt do precise math).
And you said that villian can overdefend since this turn is good for him. So what do you think about punting this one for turn and river if thats the case?

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy