Always enjoy your vids...nice mix of theory, GTO, vision, exploitation, good descriptions of your thinking in all spots w/r/t gto vs. exploits, etc. Much appreciation.
I prefer only 2 tables of zoom if you are going to review a session more quickly and get through more hands. But the way you did this 4 table review was good where you stop to focus on on specific hands. I like the deeper look in the solver as well. Looking forward to the next part.
I think i would rather see more play&explain and less vision solution especially in those spots when vision won’t give us the exact answer.
IMO it will make the video correct since some spots aren't the same.
those who got to me the most were;
50bb UTGvsBB 6:30. 9887s open and facing a wheel turn and vision dont gives us the option to check the correct solution when the wheel hit the turn after we X flop.
instead it takes us to Q64hh which turn (3) complete the 57 and not a wheel. for me it feels like way to big of a difference between those two for the majority of our AA+wheel UTG then our 57xx utg.
also 27:00 QQ97 3bp UTGvsSB on AT8r feels a little different then AT7 with QQ98, since i think we can rep a lot more QJ’s who floated the flop vs high frequency cbet on AT8, which we can’t rep that much on AT7 when the K hit.
I really like your thought process and the way you explain, so I think video will be way better if you'll mix between them a little more and maybe go to vision when it offers the exact board.
fair enough, when he exact boards deviate from what vision offers the solution becomes somewhat flawed. I will keep that in mind and use vision mainly when it's possible to analyse the correct boards.
My next series is probably going to be live play again to mix things up ...
Loading 5 Comments...
Always enjoy your vids...nice mix of theory, GTO, vision, exploitation, good descriptions of your thinking in all spots w/r/t gto vs. exploits, etc. Much appreciation.
Thanks, I appreciate it! Will keep ‘em coming!
I prefer only 2 tables of zoom if you are going to review a session more quickly and get through more hands. But the way you did this 4 table review was good where you stop to focus on on specific hands. I like the deeper look in the solver as well. Looking forward to the next part.
I think i would rather see more play&explain and less vision solution especially in those spots when vision won’t give us the exact answer.
IMO it will make the video correct since some spots aren't the same.
those who got to me the most were;
50bb UTGvsBB 6:30. 9887s open and facing a wheel turn and vision dont gives us the option to check the correct solution when the wheel hit the turn after we X flop.
instead it takes us to Q64hh which turn (3) complete the 57 and not a wheel. for me it feels like way to big of a difference between those two for the majority of our AA+wheel UTG then our 57xx utg.
also 27:00 QQ97 3bp UTGvsSB on AT8r feels a little different then AT7 with QQ98, since i think we can rep a lot more QJ’s who floated the flop vs high frequency cbet on AT8, which we can’t rep that much on AT7 when the K hit.
I really like your thought process and the way you explain, so I think video will be way better if you'll mix between them a little more and maybe go to vision when it offers the exact board.
Anyway, thanks! gonna catch part2 soon)
fair enough, when he exact boards deviate from what vision offers the solution becomes somewhat flawed. I will keep that in mind and use vision mainly when it's possible to analyse the correct boards.
My next series is probably going to be live play again to mix things up ...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.