Well hud is not over stacks, and names are on the hud. But I agree my hud can look a little bit splashy if u r not use to it and lose some info at first sight. Second part is recorded with same HUD. But after that gonna im gonna change it for a basic one.
Sorry for that, and thanks for feedback.
18 min mark, Table 4 - You say you should have check raised all in with QQ43ss on A54ssc 8c K. While it's true villain is somewhat capped, don't you think you'd be bluffing too much if you would do it here with no blockers?
when someones range is capped , and you think they will give you credit, playing unbalanced and having higher bluffing frequencies is EV+.
I think jay's value range OTR is AK and KKss (ton more of the first than the second), so giving this range i would feel comfortable checkraising value hands like 23, 67, sets.
i dont have many of those in my sb range, btu after i x/c flop obviously all of them are there.
I dont feel good x/r river with Ax given i block exactly the type of hands i want to bluff, so that leaves as bluffing hands basicaly my missed draws and weird 54xx.
I havent done the math if its tooooo un unbalanced to bluff with all of them, but I think given his range is somehat capped I can add more hands than what GTO would say. Also this is a spot where I feel people dont checkraise allin as a bluff often at all , so I expect to get a ton of credit from most opponents.
usually the problem when bluffing with no blockers is that u block the type of hands u want to bluff, for example u triple barrel on KT8ss32 with AQJ9ss . In this case that doesnt apply, so the only consideration would be to count how many bluffs/value ratio we have and make a guess how much credit will villain give to us so we can bluff at a high frequency.
usually when we are OOP and take a potcontrol line its because we are trying to avoid getting coolered badly, protect our checking range, or having really tough spots in later streets when the board changes.
When we are deep this becomes way more important. For example lets imagine we are super deep and turn its a 9s and we have something like 97xx , obviously betting there is bad cause if we get called the board its gonna change too often, and if we get raised its a shame to fold but we have 0 visibility otr.
so my gameplan in this type of boards is just trying to potcontrol a ton unless we are nutted or we have nut blockers that we can bluff with.
Loading 14 Comments...
Would be Nice for your future videos if your hud wasn't all over the place and you could see stack sizes and screennames
Well hud is not over stacks, and names are on the hud. But I agree my hud can look a little bit splashy if u r not use to it and lose some info at first sight. Second part is recorded with same HUD. But after that gonna im gonna change it for a basic one.
Sorry for that, and thanks for feedback.
Maybe it looks worse, cause I watched it on the iPad
yes, but anyway i will change it for future videos (after part 2)
18 min mark, Table 4 - You say you should have check raised all in with QQ43ss on A54ssc 8c K. While it's true villain is somewhat capped, don't you think you'd be bluffing too much if you would do it here with no blockers?
when someones range is capped , and you think they will give you credit, playing unbalanced and having higher bluffing frequencies is EV+.
I think jay's value range OTR is AK and KKss (ton more of the first than the second), so giving this range i would feel comfortable checkraising value hands like 23, 67, sets.
i dont have many of those in my sb range, btu after i x/c flop obviously all of them are there.
I dont feel good x/r river with Ax given i block exactly the type of hands i want to bluff, so that leaves as bluffing hands basicaly my missed draws and weird 54xx.
I havent done the math if its tooooo un unbalanced to bluff with all of them, but I think given his range is somehat capped I can add more hands than what GTO would say. Also this is a spot where I feel people dont checkraise allin as a bluff often at all , so I expect to get a ton of credit from most opponents.
usually the problem when bluffing with no blockers is that u block the type of hands u want to bluff, for example u triple barrel on KT8ss32 with AQJ9ss . In this case that doesnt apply, so the only consideration would be to count how many bluffs/value ratio we have and make a guess how much credit will villain give to us so we can bluff at a high frequency.
nice explanation! looking forward to more content from you.
thanks !
Buenas Alex,
Really good video, I love your approach and your explanations.
1 saludo and thank you very much.
Thank you !
Min 34, table 1.
If you play xc, what's the plan for the dynamics/statics turns with deep stack?
Thanks
usually when we are OOP and take a potcontrol line its because we are trying to avoid getting coolered badly, protect our checking range, or having really tough spots in later streets when the board changes.
When we are deep this becomes way more important. For example lets imagine we are super deep and turn its a 9s and we have something like 97xx , obviously betting there is bad cause if we get called the board its gonna change too often, and if we get raised its a shame to fold but we have 0 visibility otr.
so my gameplan in this type of boards is just trying to potcontrol a ton unless we are nutted or we have nut blockers that we can bluff with.
Nice video boss and excellent comments
thanks!
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.