An Accidental Session at $200NL: More Action & Solver Analysis
Posted by Alexandra Fagaras
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 4 Comments...
Hey Alexandra, nice video!
In this 4bet pot, you mentioned that even if this weren't a range bet, you might opt to range bet anyway because of how people respond. Is this based on MDA research? Do you expect people to over-fold, under-raise, or both?
Glad you liked it !
It is MDA based to some extent - Meaning it's obvious people under xR and overfold in 4bet pots OOP, now I'm not a "MDA pro" and I don't have tens or hundreds of millions of hands which I imagine is what you need to see what population does in this exact texture. But they do under-raise overall, and just intuitively speaking it's very rare to see lower stakes players shove enough low PPs and mid pairs in these configurations, and those hands should be close to pure jam.
As for this hand, we can range bet even in theory, although the solver mostly prefers an all-in as a cbet size which makes sense.
Alexandra,
Enjoyed the mix of solver analysis along with your real time review of the play. A couple of interesting hands that you go through in this one. Nice video.
Thanks
Cool. Will do more of them :)
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.