6:00 : Yes, and some worse Ax like ATo, A9o, A5o etc. Basically hands that I can't profitably flat
11:40 I think you can make a case for having some flats in a softer lineup and while AJs is a hand that makes sense to flat, overall our range doesn't really want to play calls here. That said, I don't think calling would have been a mistake here. I would prefer calling to 3b/f.
Alex,
In the hand at ~38:00 when you jam 53o (pretty much any two cards), do you think that in practice the BB calling range will be slightly tighter than what it should be in theory? Maybe you get folds from A7o, QTs (instead of mix), maybe K9s or A4s? Not that you could jam any wider here, but this might work even better than it does in theory. Is this something that you see or are these fields playing this spot pretty accurately?
Yeah I think it is quite likely some people will end up calling too tight here. I would say it's more specific opponent dependent than field dependent.
Alex,
Really enjoyed this video as well as the format (live video analysis). Your analysis/commentary is very well done. Great job, I look forward to seeing the rest of the series.
Loading 7 Comments...
Very very nice one!
This series is really great.
6:00 will you use offsuit broadways as 3bet fold candidates?
11:40 will you have a calling range in fuchs place guven the icm pressure?
Thanks!
Happy to hear you like it!
6:00 : Yes, and some worse Ax like ATo, A9o, A5o etc. Basically hands that I can't profitably flat
11:40 I think you can make a case for having some flats in a softer lineup and while AJs is a hand that makes sense to flat, overall our range doesn't really want to play calls here. That said, I don't think calling would have been a mistake here. I would prefer calling to 3b/f.
Great video, enjoy it a lot. Thanks Alex!
Alex,
In the hand at ~38:00 when you jam 53o (pretty much any two cards), do you think that in practice the BB calling range will be slightly tighter than what it should be in theory? Maybe you get folds from A7o, QTs (instead of mix), maybe K9s or A4s? Not that you could jam any wider here, but this might work even better than it does in theory. Is this something that you see or are these fields playing this spot pretty accurately?
Thanks Alex
Yeah I think it is quite likely some people will end up calling too tight here. I would say it's more specific opponent dependent than field dependent.
Alex,
Really enjoyed this video as well as the format (live video analysis). Your analysis/commentary is very well done. Great job, I look forward to seeing the rest of the series.
Thanks Alex
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.