@ 6.35 where u have JJ and you say that u are happy with ur perfect sizing and that if u made it any smaller it would induce a flat. i dont quite catch the logic cause at these stack depths ur 2.5x 3bet sizing is already small and he can easily peel at it if he wants.
and about ur first point of inducing a 4bet to 5bet get it in. again it seems that the stacks are too deep to do it for value with JJ. what are the worse hands that small blind is going to 4bet u with? and what are the worse hands that are going to call ur 5bet shove?
You are right that with his stack size we could have made it bigger in order to make him avoid peeling. It does help induce 4b though if we keep it cheaper and the final move for the villain. I believe with bvb dynamics we are happy to get in JJ here preflop, and that villain will be 4b/folding a decent amount of the time as a bluff.
15:35 - don't you feel the player could of had a K(KQ/KJ) here when making the river bet? I felt that the river bet was slightly risky given that he called the turn. Or is there more reasoning behind the river bet?
I feel like there are many more combinations of Ax in the villains range. Most blocker in position 3b hands such as weak Kx offsuits would definitely opt to continuation bet the flop. Since he didn't, villains Kx range turns into only KQ/KJ as you said, and with two kings out on the board already there are not many combos left. Ax on the other hand will opt the check back the flop a decent portion of the time. We do get the occasional hero's as well as coolering Tx. We don't risk too much by betting the river, and we can happily fold to a jam. Therefore, bet folding here is the most optimal line in my opinion.
the 9 10 off around 26:00, you did not complete nor call a raise, you were in the BB. The whole hand you were under the impression that you "completed" or called a min-raise :). It would change the dynamic of the hand a bit but i still think vs the min bet and then min-raise, and the fact you are "sandwhiched" :), i personally like a fold and that is what you did in game.
Loading 7 Comments...
@ 6.35 where u have JJ and you say that u are happy with ur perfect sizing and that if u made it any smaller it would induce a flat. i dont quite catch the logic cause at these stack depths ur 2.5x 3bet sizing is already small and he can easily peel at it if he wants.
and about ur first point of inducing a 4bet to 5bet get it in. again it seems that the stacks are too deep to do it for value with JJ. what are the worse hands that small blind is going to 4bet u with? and what are the worse hands that are going to call ur 5bet shove?
You are right that with his stack size we could have made it bigger in order to make him avoid peeling. It does help induce 4b though if we keep it cheaper and the final move for the villain. I believe with bvb dynamics we are happy to get in JJ here preflop, and that villain will be 4b/folding a decent amount of the time as a bluff.
15:35 - don't you feel the player could of had a K(KQ/KJ) here when making the river bet? I felt that the river bet was slightly risky given that he called the turn. Or is there more reasoning behind the river bet?
I feel like there are many more combinations of Ax in the villains range. Most blocker in position 3b hands such as weak Kx offsuits would definitely opt to continuation bet the flop. Since he didn't, villains Kx range turns into only KQ/KJ as you said, and with two kings out on the board already there are not many combos left. Ax on the other hand will opt the check back the flop a decent portion of the time. We do get the occasional hero's as well as coolering Tx. We don't risk too much by betting the river, and we can happily fold to a jam. Therefore, bet folding here is the most optimal line in my opinion.
23:23 - Why did you fold 55?
This fold is definitely on the nittier side but I think it is fine vs a 2.5x pre ante with a short stack in the big blind.
the 9 10 off around 26:00, you did not complete nor call a raise, you were in the BB. The whole hand you were under the impression that you "completed" or called a min-raise :). It would change the dynamic of the hand a bit but i still think vs the min bet and then min-raise, and the fact you are "sandwhiched" :), i personally like a fold and that is what you did in game.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.