Hi Teunuss, nice video. I was just wondering if it was good to develop a donking range at 15'25 table 2 in vilain shoes on the river ? As i think he can have more Tx hands than us and transform into bluffs his weakest pair.
Is it an option to transform our TT into bluff table 3 31'50 ? Eagerly waiting the other parts ;)
I think it does make sense to develop a donking range for a fairly small sizing, IP will have more 2p and set combo's than OOP when the action goes bet/c x/c.
It's also a nice way for him to extract some value out of those 44/QJ type of hands that IP will have a ton.
I think it's an option to turn the few 8x I have into a bluff, I think TT is a little too strong too bluff, and a bit to optimistic too.
River I like my fold, I think bluffcatching some JJ would be more than enough.
Ty for the answer ! I think it's a good fold too on the river, not easy (i would probably do the mistake in game), but don't feel that vilain will often bluff this spot and he can certainly have JJ/KK and we have better bluff catchers as you said ^^
love ur vids really do they have changed my game a lot.
But could you please consider doing a theory/only include spots where you open limp the SB vid in the future please?
Im not asking for the exact ranges ofc :P, just want to see some more insight that how to construct my limp/3b ranges with rng and just how to play that spot as i have some problems with deploying it in the game vs regs.
Super Teunus how are you?.. min 30 the JT suit hand in table 4.. what do you think about turning it in to a check shove in the river by representing JJ in this spot?... after all we could be playing JJ the exact same way since by taking this line we can allow him to thin value bet like he love to do (and punish him for that play ;) ) and also he have some hands he could choose to bluff with in that run out... Thanks, great video as always and Gl at the tables
I agree, jamming is a very solid option, OOP is likely to have a c/r range here, and most of the obvious bluffs are being used as bluffcatchers or bluff themselves, so having a Jx hand that is not capable of calling the river, I think it makes a lot of sense to use the JTs combo's that don't bet flop to c/shove.
tough spot with JTs On J7xss, Qs
The river is a spot i have a tough time folding as we are decently high up in our range. Most of our own Qx bets the flop, and are flush combos are limited to about 5-6 at most. Is this a standard fold for you?
Hey Teunuss, I’ve really been enjoying your videos, looking forward to more of them. Could you go more in depth into that 44 hand (20:30) on the 6h4h5dAs board please. You mentioned in video that it was UTG who lead small but it was BB so I guess his range hits this board harder than UTG range would which should in theory i guess mean BTN should be stronger but not sure. I'm also interested in hearing your thoughts on if you should ever have a flop raising range here after BTN has raised. I can see why we call 44, 55, 66, 78 here sometimes so that our flatting range just doesn’t consist of draws and likely our equity isn’t great vs ranges that are getting all in with us but just a thought that crossed my mind. Do you really think his range is always 66/55/87? Obviously your range is very strong to over call flop, is 44 the best hand you are folding here? Folding 55? I assume you're also folding Axhh hands?
around 12 mins we open QTo 2.3x btn and face a 4.3x 3b from sb, were 180bb deep and fold, isnt this quite a tight fold here? i mean im sure we value some suited cards better but isnt QTo still a call? i noticed ur opening fairly tight on button so maybe that contributes but.. i guess were deeper so the reverse implied odds are a little more of a negative factor to this particular hand? I mean if sb is 3betting a linear range then i guess reverse implied odds are a big factor here jus struck me as seeming like it would be hard to achieve the correct defense frequency folding hands as good as this, im sure im wrong tho if you folded...
Loading 13 Comments...
Hi Teunuss, nice video. I was just wondering if it was good to develop a donking range at 15'25 table 2 in vilain shoes on the river ? As i think he can have more Tx hands than us and transform into bluffs his weakest pair.
Is it an option to transform our TT into bluff table 3 31'50 ? Eagerly waiting the other parts ;)
I think it does make sense to develop a donking range for a fairly small sizing, IP will have more 2p and set combo's than OOP when the action goes bet/c x/c.
It's also a nice way for him to extract some value out of those 44/QJ type of hands that IP will have a ton.
I think it's an option to turn the few 8x I have into a bluff, I think TT is a little too strong too bluff, and a bit to optimistic too.
River I like my fold, I think bluffcatching some JJ would be more than enough.
Ty for the answer ! I think it's a good fold too on the river, not easy (i would probably do the mistake in game), but don't feel that vilain will often bluff this spot and he can certainly have JJ/KK and we have better bluff catchers as you said ^^
Hi,
love ur vids really do they have changed my game a lot.
But could you please consider doing a theory/only include spots where you open limp the SB vid in the future please?
Im not asking for the exact ranges ofc :P, just want to see some more insight that how to construct my limp/3b ranges with rng and just how to play that spot as i have some problems with deploying it in the game vs regs.
Thanks a lot and keep the awesome videos coming!
I will certainly consider making one of those, but still have to find a way to make that an interesting video!
Super Teunus how are you?.. min 30 the JT suit hand in table 4.. what do you think about turning it in to a check shove in the river by representing JJ in this spot?... after all we could be playing JJ the exact same way since by taking this line we can allow him to thin value bet like he love to do (and punish him for that play ;) ) and also he have some hands he could choose to bluff with in that run out... Thanks, great video as always and Gl at the tables
I agree, jamming is a very solid option, OOP is likely to have a c/r range here, and most of the obvious bluffs are being used as bluffcatchers or bluff themselves, so having a Jx hand that is not capable of calling the river, I think it makes a lot of sense to use the JTs combo's that don't bet flop to c/shove.
thoughts on jamming Jts on his river bet @ 30.49 ?
Hi,would you mind telling or sending the link for download of the RNG you use?Thanks
https://www.dropbox.com/s/krjsks302vh0703/RandomNumberGenerator.exe?dl=0
tough spot with JTs On J7xss, Qs
The river is a spot i have a tough time folding as we are decently high up in our range. Most of our own Qx bets the flop, and are flush combos are limited to about 5-6 at most. Is this a standard fold for you?
Hey Teunuss, I’ve really been enjoying your videos, looking forward to more of them. Could you go more in depth into that 44 hand (20:30) on the 6h4h5dAs board please. You mentioned in video that it was UTG who lead small but it was BB so I guess his range hits this board harder than UTG range would which should in theory i guess mean BTN should be stronger but not sure. I'm also interested in hearing your thoughts on if you should ever have a flop raising range here after BTN has raised. I can see why we call 44, 55, 66, 78 here sometimes so that our flatting range just doesn’t consist of draws and likely our equity isn’t great vs ranges that are getting all in with us but just a thought that crossed my mind. Do you really think his range is always 66/55/87? Obviously your range is very strong to over call flop, is 44 the best hand you are folding here? Folding 55? I assume you're also folding Axhh hands?
around 12 mins we open QTo 2.3x btn and face a 4.3x 3b from sb, were 180bb deep and fold, isnt this quite a tight fold here? i mean im sure we value some suited cards better but isnt QTo still a call? i noticed ur opening fairly tight on button so maybe that contributes but.. i guess were deeper so the reverse implied odds are a little more of a negative factor to this particular hand? I mean if sb is 3betting a linear range then i guess reverse implied odds are a big factor here jus struck me as seeming like it would be hard to achieve the correct defense frequency folding hands as good as this, im sure im wrong tho if you folded...
thanks for vid!
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.