$5/$10 Heads Up Session Review (part 3)

Posted by

You’re watching:

$5/$10 Heads Up Session Review (part 3)

user avatar

teunuss

Elite Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

$5/$10 Heads Up Session Review (part 3)

user avatar

teunuss

POSTED Aug 16, 2015

Teunuss looks to take advantage against a relatively passive opponent in this 3rd installment of his HU series.

13 Comments

Loading 13 Comments...

shakesbear 9 years, 7 months ago

Cliff:
- We start punish villain for being too passive with over bets
- GTO solver confuses me a little with hand selections.ie why its better for villain to call with KTos than QT or JT on 8A9T3. Isn’t JT and QT has better blockers for QJ?
- Put pressure on villain’s thin value betting range
- Bluff bottom of our range to avoid bluff too much or too little
- When we are choosing our bet size, think about what other hands we will bet for this size. ie @19:36 a shove with a boat maybe not be the best play for our range
- Can’t always just check a pair down, sometimes its more profitable turning it into bluffs @32:00
- Sometimes we just need to try to max our EV instead of playing GTO.
- When op says “I’m not sure his play xxx” means that’s probably not a good play. Don’t try that at home

Thank you for the video. It’s fantastic as always.
We waited 3 loooooooooooog weeks for it. Can you release the next one sooner please ?

DrhouseMD 9 years, 7 months ago

I think the solver prefers to call with K10 because OOP likes to bluff with his Jx and Qx more than with Kx. Not having a Q, or a J in your own range therefore is better .

teunuss 9 years, 7 months ago

Haha that will not be up to me, but I will hand in a nice 2 parter in the next two days before I win the EPT Barcelona :)

Azartus 9 years, 7 months ago

ohhhh man! nothing will make me happier than to see my hero scooping one EPT!! that will be awesome!!! take it down man you deserve it for sure!
Btwn playing balance in tournaments its very hard right? because of the stack sizes change all the time,ICM, also people just click a lot more, etc, etc, i think an exploitable approach is necessary to beat tournaments in the long run, i might be wrong... So who do you think is a good balance tournament player here in RIO to fallow and analyze his play?

teunuss 9 years, 7 months ago

Yes live mtt defenitely have to play hyper exploitable, hopefully I can keep my patience this series, cause my mtt results speak for themselves (0 out of 15)

And mtt videos... Do those exist? :)

Kaizen 9 years, 7 months ago

Hey teunuss very nice video ! Learned a lot of things and everything is always well explained. Just have two questions :
@10'20 : Why do you think that it's problematic to always bet a T here ?
I find that he doesn't have a lot of better hands here except few 2 and we can value on his 5 x hands. Maybe it's just to prevent him to overbluff river by raising and representing a set and for not having a weak check range oop ? Not sure about my suppositions

@23'35 : I wouldn't think that he will have this particular in his range too.
But i don't understand to have a leading range on this card because i don't put vilain on a lot of 9 x since he checks the flop and he can easily have a 7. We check called the turn so i don't find that we have a lot of bluffs here to balance with all of our Ax combos and i expect vilain fold his few 9 x if you lead the river so we are only call by better hands. No ?
Ty for your answer and for the serie ;)

teunuss 9 years, 7 months ago

Hey thanks!

-It seems like you are correct (gto software agrees with you :) ), we have a good amount of 5x to c/c and it is unnecessary to strengthen our checking range with a lot of Tx. (a few Txdd are suggested as c/c here)

-I thought about it/discussed it because the A is a big range improver for OOP, IP probably never bets flop or turn with Ax (very few), and OOP c/c a ton on the turn with AJ/AQ/AK.
You are right about the IP having more nutted hands, but I don't agree with you that IP won't have a lot of 9x, he will certainly checkback a fair amount of his 9T/J9/Q9/K9 combo's to bet turn and river with them, and we can extract some value out of them by leading small on the river. So I think having a pretty wide leading range is a fine play here (69ss is obv not part of that)

Azartus 9 years, 7 months ago

Hey Teunuss, great video as usual!! i was waiting for this video like crazy, worth every second of anxiety i had while waiting haha, Btwn i love the "coming back" question at the end of the video, lololoolllolol we want to get some more hands with this guy i bet! ok so i have a question
-Min 29.33, you said you want to create an over bet range in this spot when the 7 pairs the board(table on the right side), but i was just thinking, if we had a 7 , and our opponent double check, do we really would want to over bet a 7 there? i mean, i understand that we can add ton of bluff in this spots and it will be fine, but our opponent already show ton of weakness in this spot by double checking, so maybe we could bet a normal size in the turn to get a call of the part of his range that is weak and then create the over bet for the river range attacking a really cap weak range in general... that way we get an extra bet in and pounce even harder on it... maybe we can go to half pot bet in the turn so that way also could be beneficial for the middle pair type of hands and some weaker top pairs that we checked back on the flop what do you think about that strategy? (i guess what i m suggesting here is an exploitative line and i know you enjoy more a balance approach and rules like only betting once and big with no equity hands am i correct?) thanks in advance again super Teunuss and have a great week!

teunuss 9 years, 7 months ago

Thanks!
-I think a ton of players respond to this card pairing by checking a wide range (including a decent % of Kx/ probably 100% of Qx and a smaller % of 7x as well), I do agree with you that it's probably a good response to bet smaller with 7x and big parts of our whole range against this opponent and make a larger bet on the river.

SPrince 9 years, 7 months ago

I really liked this series, you pretty much cover all angles while breaking down a hand and piosolver addition was great as well.

BCRUNGOOD 9 years, 7 months ago

Kx9d on flop of 784dd when you are in the BB around minute 38. You say this is a standard c/f on the flop when we have two overs, backdoor straight draw and backdoor 9 high flush draw. Don't you think this is a reasonable hand to float 1 with especially vs a passive opponent? Maybe it's just vs his sizing you don't like peeling? At what bet size would you call?

Fishfeast 9 years, 3 months ago

4-25- right table, is this a spot we could consider sizing up turn to pot or larger, we have a tonne of draws we want to bet and a couple of straights and two pairs he probably cant have

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy