$500 Zoom PLO and Theory Concepts
Posted by Richard Gryko
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 12 Comments...
Very good content as always.
On 854hh9c7o it also looks like IP does not want to block wheel cards since a lot of OOP's snap XF's are going to have a lot of PR:(A2,A3).
cool, didn't notice this but logic you outline makes sense, one small qualifier is that when we xc turn with our overpair region we basically have to have FD/OE/GS so folding hands with wheel cards might be to an extent the same thing as folding dry overpairs (bc when we have the latter we very often have the former, esp in a SB cold call range).
Like in the dark as always. For sure the best PLO content on rio. Please, more!!
more on the way :)
very good video
Really really great stuff! End of video you flat 9753ds BTNvsCO whereas I would 3b or fold but lean fold 90% unless I’m isolating a rec. Once either or both the blinds VPIP I would think that our suits are getting devalued a lot, and I’d expect at least 3ways to the flop at least half the time. So is the BTN positional advantage compensating for what I see to be problems with flatting as you did? Are you flatting for board coverage?
agree blinds overcall quite often which devalues suits, but from memory this hand just calls anyway (at least at some rake structures), when pot does go HU it looks from a quick skim like I could also have been anticipating some flop misplays which generate additional EV. not really flatting for board coverage, to the extent that thats a thing, I do think its an error to mix 3b/f here, btn 3b strat looks much diff in a solver to how it was understood maybe a year/18mths ago ("3b a ton of double suited junk bc even though everyone is doing it its somehow deceptive and if he calls ill crush him bc I'm IP") - not mocking btw, when I say "how it was understood", I could alternatively have said, "how I understood it".
Really great stuff, Richard. Thank you!
Np, glad you enjoyed :)
Fantastic content. Really enjoyed this one
wow I never realized we could figure out the error size by unchecking that box...thats a pretty huge realization imo
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.