Zoom $500 Session Review (part 1)

Posted by

You’re watching:

Zoom $500 Session Review (part 1)

user avatar

EluSiVeMark

Elite Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

Zoom $500 Session Review (part 1)

user avatar

EluSiVeMark

POSTED Jul 28, 2018

Mark Lammers aka EluSiveMark is back at the $500 zoom tables with his first session review series after tuning up his game and moving into a new house.

12 Comments

Loading 12 Comments...

zoomspy 6 years, 7 months ago

hi, i notice lots of z500 player even with high winrate play a lots of z200 in july.
and regular table is even worse, some NL5k player like bit2easy even play as low as 3/6.
do you think it affect your hourly ?

EluSiVeMark 6 years, 7 months ago

Hi,

Yes noticed the same. Their were less recs in the pool, wsop was running and maybe holidays affected the pools.

Yes this affects hourly when good players enter the pool.

Iam2good 6 years, 7 months ago

Min 10:40, 89s hand on 10Ac2c 6c. Could you explain why you want to check 100% of hands here. On the 6c he may have slightly more flushes than you have, but does he really have such a big range advanced overall? How do you want to play flushdraws like KJ/KQ/QJo?

EluSiVeMark 6 years, 7 months ago

If i said in the video that i want to check 100% then i was wrong.
We should have a betting range.
KQo,KJo with a flushdraw should be a mix between betting and x/raising with betting being the higher frequency play.

bombriver 6 years, 6 months ago

At 16:03 on Table #2 you mentioned that KTo (no spade) is a good bluff candidate on the Js 9s 6s- As board because you block other KTo combo's but Im not sure how you can block spades w/o having spades. I would imagine you have more Kx in your range being the PRF but I dont understand how having and of the 3 non spade K make it less likely villain has the K spade specifically

EluSiVeMark 6 years, 6 months ago

He is likely folding weak offsuit Kx hands. He is definitely folding weak Tsx hands preflop. So if we have KT offsuit we block his Kstx and his TsKx. So having this combo is better than having no blockers. Also this combo has equity against his 2 pair continues.

Hopes this makes some sense.

bombriver 6 years, 6 months ago

Yes that does make sense, thanks. Would you prefer to have QTo (no spade) here to KTo? does having more equity vs anything but flushes make up for the fact that we dont block K's?

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy