I liked the pio work. I think the live play
Was a bit too fast to gather a great deal of information. Clearly, you can play at that speed but in order to give good analysis, I think some more time is need to breakdown the play. I don’t know if you make plo videos, but that would also be useful to watch. Ty for the tips.
06:47 you can't even defend flushdraws here, your getting 2/1 and you need 4,2/1, so even with implieds, you can never ever call here. Sorry, but that's like basic maths+ your outs are not clean if he has set Aces or Kings or AK and A or K hits on the river. So if you always stack him, you still can't call because his stacksize is too small. If you call 17, you have to win (17x4.2) 71.4 by the rvier, and the potsize+ his rest stack is 58.44$.
Somehow weird to see how coaches in 2018 still have these huge basic "odds calculating leaks".
2nd part of the video, especially the guideline for players who wanna move up, was very good.
That’s too easy an explanation. If you think u can’t even call flush draws, then what unmade hands are u calling there? Suppose when a blank card hits on the river, and your opponent checks. When hero shoves, what bluffs can hero have if hero does not even defend flush draws on the turn?
Sorry, that's not how poker works. Expected value of a call is not directly dependent on your pot odds. Its dependent on the range vs range interaction on all possible river cards. The relationship of relative nutted combos between both ranges is very important and effects the ability of each range to value bet or bluff on different runouts. This is clearly proven using PIOsolver models by checking the EV of THE SAME combo of hand on two players that have different ranges. The EV of a hand is dependent on the other hands in your range.
Loading 11 Comments...
I liked the pio work. I think the live play
Was a bit too fast to gather a great deal of information. Clearly, you can play at that speed but in order to give good analysis, I think some more time is need to breakdown the play. I don’t know if you make plo videos, but that would also be useful to watch. Ty for the tips.
+1
Makes sense. Looks like a few people agreed that 2 tables is better. A lot of my videos use 2 tables you can check those out!
really nice video!
Cheers
06:47 you can't even defend flushdraws here, your getting 2/1 and you need 4,2/1, so even with implieds, you can never ever call here. Sorry, but that's like basic maths+ your outs are not clean if he has set Aces or Kings or AK and A or K hits on the river. So if you always stack him, you still can't call because his stacksize is too small. If you call 17, you have to win (17x4.2) 71.4 by the rvier, and the potsize+ his rest stack is 58.44$.
Somehow weird to see how coaches in 2018 still have these huge basic "odds calculating leaks".
2nd part of the video, especially the guideline for players who wanna move up, was very good.
That’s too easy an explanation. If you think u can’t even call flush draws, then what unmade hands are u calling there? Suppose when a blank card hits on the river, and your opponent checks. When hero shoves, what bluffs can hero have if hero does not even defend flush draws on the turn?
Sorry, that's not how poker works. Expected value of a call is not directly dependent on your pot odds. Its dependent on the range vs range interaction on all possible river cards. The relationship of relative nutted combos between both ranges is very important and effects the ability of each range to value bet or bluff on different runouts. This is clearly proven using PIOsolver models by checking the EV of THE SAME combo of hand on two players that have different ranges. The EV of a hand is dependent on the other hands in your range.
jimmylaessig25 so how do u explain that the solver defends strong flush draws, and combos draws like 8d6d or 7d6d here?
Explanation in above comment mate
Great explanation !!! Would like to see more like this !!!
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.