4 Table $2.5/$5 6-Max Zoom NLHE (part 1)
Posted by EluSiVeMark
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 13 Comments...
Thanks for the video, it's very interesting.
15:50 table 2 you have A7o in SB blind battle. You bet flop, bet turn on A 8 7r Jtt. Could you explain what you would do vs a turn raise from villain and what you do on brick/wet rivers when called? Thank you.
Thank you Jussayno,
First of all, getting raised on that turn would put us in a pretty bad spot.
If i have a significant samplesize i would check how often he is raising the turn vs turn cbets.
If this is less than 5% i could see myself folding. If it's higher than that i am probably calling turn and check/ deciding river.
I think it is very player dependant. There are players that always have 9T here and there are players that maybe never have 9T there because they want to keep that in their calling range.
It's just tough to give you an exact answer because there probably isnt one ;)
Good videos mark! like how you base your decision much more on stats than some other coaches.
Can you help me understand better the 1st line of your hud. What are BB FBB and bb stats? thanks
Hi Beardso,
Thanks, the stats indicate how often they fold vs steals. Fold bb vs btn, fold bb vs sb, fold sb vs btn steal
Player amarn for Example : what does 14 19 34 60 17 means ?
raise first in for every position: ep mp co btn sb
Good vid!
Question about this spot on 14:00:
You say you would fold AK on rvr, would you fold some on turn allready ? If you dont then i think we would be exploitable GTO wise. As hes betting half pot and our sets/2pairs are 18-22 combos depending on if you open A5s,A8s or not. And our AK,AJhh,AThh are 14 combos so we would fold 43% of our range when he needs 33% folds. If we are exploitable is it a problem we should worry about ?
Its proably more of an exploitative spot tho, that villain just dssnt have enough bluffs possible like this for us to call AK. Or how do you see this spot ?
Thanks Numbers,
Tbh, AK might be a fold vs this guy in these positions on the flop.
-We see that he raises a cbet only 8% of the time.
-He flat the sb vs mp open, so he has a pretty strong range.
-We are 3way.
-AK is not the top of our cbetting range.
-There arent a lot of bluffinghands in his range which could x/r.
I think we are exploiting him by folding some strongish hands vs his x/r rather than that i feel exploited by folding for example AK here.
Hey Mark,
you said in this or another video you prefer flatting QQ against UTG-Raiser, but you like to 3Bet if he opens more than 16%. Why exactly 16%?
Which Range would you Flat on the Button for example against an UTG Raise who has like 15% opening Range?
Thanks Mark! Very nice videos!
Hi Mehrraisen,
I haven't done extensive math to back up flatting QQ vs utg is better when he is tighter than a certain range. But from my experience and with my image i dont think i get it in good when facing a 4bet and a call when i jam. I certainly think its still +ev to 3bet/5bet or 3/bet and call a 4/bet, but overall i think having QQand also AK in my flatting range vs tighter utg players is a good strategy.
My flatting range would be smth like 22-QQ or 55-QQ and then ATs+ AQo+ KJs+
This differentiates alot depending on blinds and initial raiser and stacksizes etc.
Would you normally call with small Suited Connectors like 54s against another regular?
u mean vs a 3bet or vs an openraise? But i normally fold vs an openraise and sometimes call vs a 3bet.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.