My gut reaction was that he has more K9 and KK combos than us, so we shouldn't lead, but I suspect we might have more trips+ than him as a whole.
Usually, I have a good feel for how ranges roughly break down, but here my intuition is not giving me anything. I think that to give you a good answer, we'd need assumptions and the range breakdowns that stem from those assumptions.
I gave it a quick look with some generic ranges, but nothing super interesting came out of it. Personally, I can't see a compelling reason for the SB to have a leading range here. The 9h turn is one of the worse cards for the SB. It's maybe not quite as bad as people generally seem to think, but it's certainly not good.
BB has a pretty large equity advantage on average, and there's no place in the distribution where the SB really has an edge. So fundamentally, I can't see a reason for SB to lead. Exploitatively I can't really see it either, but maybe someone else can?
17:30 on the bottom right, you made it very clear that calling is appealing because it is much easier for us to play this board in position, and this makes a lot of sense to me. But then you said you want a raising range because it is important not to let him get away with seeing a lot of turns which is our hypothesis for his block bet. But what turns do we not want him to see, given that we feel we have a distinct advantage by playing turns in position? Basically, even though seeing a cheap turn may be his goal with the 1/3 bet, isn't also our goal to see turns? As an aside, i wonder if a wide min-raise range would be good here for us since it gets cheap folds if he ever does fold and builds a pot for the turn, and as stated I think turns are easy(er) for us to play. but I suppose that would be too cute. [im a bit more of an essential-level member but like your videos, so pardon anything silly :) ]
24:00 A287ds bottom right against Cobus. What would be bottom of your calling range on the river if he would have shoved? Also you said you would like to see yourself shove with even 42 for value, why is that? Do you expect him to call you light enough there? Or is it because your bluffing range can support wider value betting range?
Loading 7 Comments...
29:00 Top left what do you think about developing a leading range on the 9 turn?
Very interesting.
My gut reaction was that he has more K9 and KK combos than us, so we shouldn't lead, but I suspect we might have more trips+ than him as a whole.
Usually, I have a good feel for how ranges roughly break down, but here my intuition is not giving me anything. I think that to give you a good answer, we'd need assumptions and the range breakdowns that stem from those assumptions.
Anyone want to take a crack at it? :)
I gave it a quick look with some generic ranges, but nothing super interesting came out of it. Personally, I can't see a compelling reason for the SB to have a leading range here. The 9h turn is one of the worse cards for the SB. It's maybe not quite as bad as people generally seem to think, but it's certainly not good.
BB has a pretty large equity advantage on average, and there's no place in the distribution where the SB really has an edge. So fundamentally, I can't see a reason for SB to lead. Exploitatively I can't really see it either, but maybe someone else can?
6max is just so great! Please keep on doing this series.
I agree. Great series!
6-max is the best!
17:30 on the bottom right, you made it very clear that calling is appealing because it is much easier for us to play this board in position, and this makes a lot of sense to me. But then you said you want a raising range because it is important not to let him get away with seeing a lot of turns which is our hypothesis for his block bet. But what turns do we not want him to see, given that we feel we have a distinct advantage by playing turns in position? Basically, even though seeing a cheap turn may be his goal with the 1/3 bet, isn't also our goal to see turns? As an aside, i wonder if a wide min-raise range would be good here for us since it gets cheap folds if he ever does fold and builds a pot for the turn, and as stated I think turns are easy(er) for us to play. but I suppose that would be too cute. [im a bit more of an essential-level member but like your videos, so pardon anything silly :) ]
Hey, great video as always!
24:00 A287ds bottom right against Cobus. What would be bottom of your calling range on the river if he would have shoved? Also you said you would like to see yourself shove with even 42 for value, why is that? Do you expect him to call you light enough there? Or is it because your bluffing range can support wider value betting range?
Thanks
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.