3 Table $2.5/$5 6-Max Zoom NLHE Session Review
Posted by Juan Copani
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 10 Comments...
Have found all your videos very enjoyable and useful for the past year since subscribing so keep up the good work Juan!
Thank you Henry !
Hey Juan, love this format you break things down very intricately. At the beginning with the 54s (2:44) you mention that you don't like the 3bettor betting the T63dd small for the fact he can have a lot of overcards and some of his medium strength hands needing protection. I agree with this, but theoretically doesn't he have the range advantage on this flop (despite you having more nut hands, i assume he doesn't have 66 and 33 as much as you) but has the overcard combinations more often than you so a bet like 1/3 shouldn't be giving up a big percentage of pot compared to what pio would say.
Also at 18:48 sb vs bb you open A6o and bet small on flop saying on this texture there are lots of hands you want to bet this flop and when villain calls he has a hard time calling a lot of turns due to his range being too weak here. Can we apply this concept to other similar flop textures? (I assume A high textures are a little different based on the composition of villains PF calling range.
I echo Henry, keep up the good work :)
I'll try the first question.
The 1/4 pot bet (3.3bb into 13.2bb) isn't taking EV away from enough of our hands to be effective. As Juan said, only a small part of our range (K9s and similar) is forced to fold to that bet.
So yes, the opponent can bet a large % of his hands because of his position and equity advantage, but needs to go a little bigger on this board because too many of our hands have enough equity to continue against 1/4 pot.
Hey zenful,
I agree with thereheis. The fact that IP have more equity on the flop it does no mean that you dont need to protect your equity on a board as dinamic as T63dd. If the board were more on the static side and you have a big range advantage then what you say has more sense to me.
Yes, we could. Maybe we can even find better examples than this board. Since here the board is kind of drawy, and even if i do have a range advantage.. is still a very wet connected board, and that is a problem when the spr is very big and you are OOP.
Thanks thereheis and Juan, that makes sense. In this spot do you favour 1 sizing or multiple?
Agreed there are lots of textures I've seen in pio better defend turns and rivers so there are better examples. If villains range is weak on the turn in average I'm curious to see whether pio likes an overbet on a few turns?
Thereheis
Would this therefore mean if the board was say Q72r, 1/4 pot would make more sense?
Hey Juan
15:30 TT how wide are you calling otr here? How much 9x should we call?
Hey Taiga,
You need to call 9x very frequent, almost all the time. Maybe you can avoid to call with some of your worst 9x blockers and call with some "weaker" bluffcatcher with better blockers.
Hi Juan
37:00 first table, if we have hand like QThh or QTcc, isn't that a perfect checkshove hand? And therefore we should have few valuecombos to balance it? And what about a bit weaker combos like KThh, KTcc ....?
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.