Hi, i would like to know your reasoning behind labeling villains as tight players (i've seen some of them are playing 29/23/9).
I guess it comes from the ratio between WWSF and WSD.
If thats the case whats that ratio?
no its just feeling wise that people bluff less that are marked as tight players. but my markings are not always correct, and people also change their playstyle, but the markings are not based on any stats in general.
Re QQ hand at 44 mins. I guess you use PIO-solver like all other RIO-coaches? (And no, please don't make any pure PIO-sim vids, there are already enough of those on here, too boring to watch and not worth the time imo).
I only have Snowie atm but I ran this hand in its scenario analysis tool and it advices call 70% and raise 30% ,with same ev for both (+6,99bb). Disregarding my critique for PIO-vids it would still be interesting to know what the answer would be if ran in PIO. Just an idea, but maybe you could start adding PIO-results (pasted in directly after the hand in the live play vids) ?
thanks, no im not planing on doing any pio review videos since i think they are pretty useless in general, especially if u are not using it correctly ingame.
anyway about that QQ hand: i think in general it would be interesting what hands to shove and to fold vs a 3bet and a cold4bet in that spot, but in this spot i dont think we need to do a pio simulation. its basically just to find the right assumption on the BU's 3betting range, which in this situation is probably really tight. i mean i dont really have many hands on this guy, but he seemed very very nitty, like really insanely nitty. so im not even sure i want to stack off against him with QQ and then we have another guy cold4betting this guy. so either he is not paying any attention to this players stats, then we probably have a somewhat breakeven shove, or he is and then i think QQ is a fold, since hes probably just cold4betting QQ/AK even if. some people might also coldcall some of them.
i dont really like coldcalling ever to be honest, since its basically faceup what we have and we just give free equity to the weaker parts of opponents range. also in addition to that we probably need to start coldcalling also stronger holdings like KK/AA to not be too imbalanced. but mainly i wouldnt do it bc its too obv what we have.
the thing is with pasting pio results after hands is that in live play we are not playing against pio players but against players who play normally always to some degree imbalanced so we shouldnt really just play pio strategies in most spots.
Loading 6 Comments...
Hi, i would like to know your reasoning behind labeling villains as tight players (i've seen some of them are playing 29/23/9).
I guess it comes from the ratio between WWSF and WSD.
If thats the case whats that ratio?
Nice vid!
no its just feeling wise that people bluff less that are marked as tight players. but my markings are not always correct, and people also change their playstyle, but the markings are not based on any stats in general.
Same question, since when is Fireesa nitreg? I ve played vs him and he can be extremely loose aggro.
yes true, also markings are not always right and peoples playstyle also change a lot sometimes.
Hey, good vid, entertaining content!
Re QQ hand at 44 mins. I guess you use PIO-solver like all other RIO-coaches? (And no, please don't make any pure PIO-sim vids, there are already enough of those on here, too boring to watch and not worth the time imo).
I only have Snowie atm but I ran this hand in its scenario analysis tool and it advices call 70% and raise 30% ,with same ev for both (+6,99bb). Disregarding my critique for PIO-vids it would still be interesting to know what the answer would be if ran in PIO. Just an idea, but maybe you could start adding PIO-results (pasted in directly after the hand in the live play vids) ?
Thanks!
thanks, no im not planing on doing any pio review videos since i think they are pretty useless in general, especially if u are not using it correctly ingame.
anyway about that QQ hand: i think in general it would be interesting what hands to shove and to fold vs a 3bet and a cold4bet in that spot, but in this spot i dont think we need to do a pio simulation. its basically just to find the right assumption on the BU's 3betting range, which in this situation is probably really tight. i mean i dont really have many hands on this guy, but he seemed very very nitty, like really insanely nitty. so im not even sure i want to stack off against him with QQ and then we have another guy cold4betting this guy. so either he is not paying any attention to this players stats, then we probably have a somewhat breakeven shove, or he is and then i think QQ is a fold, since hes probably just cold4betting QQ/AK even if. some people might also coldcall some of them.
i dont really like coldcalling ever to be honest, since its basically faceup what we have and we just give free equity to the weaker parts of opponents range. also in addition to that we probably need to start coldcalling also stronger holdings like KK/AA to not be too imbalanced. but mainly i wouldnt do it bc its too obv what we have.
the thing is with pasting pio results after hands is that in live play we are not playing against pio players but against players who play normally always to some degree imbalanced so we shouldnt really just play pio strategies in most spots.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.