i wouldnt be so sure that QQ/JJ bet anyway, and i expect him to bet his bluffs mostly on the turn. so when it goes check check on the turn, his range is more medium showdown value and not too many bluffs. I want to give him chance to herocall 99,77 and Tx, and dont want to give him chance to nit-check QQ-JJ, so i figured betting is better.

Basically its for simplifying your strategy mostly. Your range is relatively strong here and you can basically bet all of it on the flop with a 1/3 pot sizing, while for a regular sizing you would be have to split your range in betting and checking parts, which wont make much difference ev -wise (if split correctly), but will leave you with two ranges needed to be balanced

(if split correctly),

mind showing how to split it corectly? (mb an idea for next vid? *smirks*)

Best way to learn splitting your ranges is using gto software (SP , Pio, etc). For that exact hand i assume that you would bet all your top value range (and reasonable bluffs obv) and in check back leave mediocre value range to play the rest of the hand passsively with ability to bluffcatch opponents bets with the right frequency.

ok but inside the hand u cannot use pio, so how do u fastly approach this and where u make BE point? bet all TPs , check rest?

that's main reason to use smaller sizing - you don't need to think about your bet/check ranges, you just need to be able to figure out spots where you have strong enough range to bet it all with 1/3 pot.
For regular sizing I think betting all top pairs for value range would be a good move

Personally I use simple postflop and it fulfills all the needs for me in terms of reviewing my hands. I didn't go into much detail about other solvers but I assume they basically do the same thing and you should choose based on interface/pricing.
In case you decide to buy simple postflop - you can dm me for 10% discount link.

Yeah I like that format too, even though live session has it merits - you get to hear real time decision making process, while after the session I won't be able to reproduce it exactly and instead do more in depth analysis which would help in the future

Thanks for the input, this would definetly be my main video format as I feel it has the best efficiency in terms of providing useful info. So more videos like that to come for sure :)

might try do some theory or concept vid too , dat would be kool

I'm open to ideas on what to make this video about

Can you time stamp j9 hand you are talking about ?
I'll try to answer in more detail when I'm back to my pc after weekend

its at 12:30 on river on 54932, with KQo. lol no idea why i said J9s. my bad lol. This part is correct part of my question "i understand we have a lot of bluffs but i dont think overbetting is the most effective strategy with 6x. He has a similar amount of them to us, as he has all 96 65 64 63 66 in addition to some 62/76. We have a variety of k6 q6 86 type 6x (as well as we have 76) but when we bet huge, he is forced to call much fewer hands and a lot of them will be chops, so our 6x doesnt get adequate value if most calling hands are just chops."
Also "about GTO solver at 32min, u say he say he supposed to bluff shove qj cuz block ur qq/jj but u have zero qq/jj in this sim. So maybe its just used as shove (along with KT) bc it has to least sd value of anything in his range (his ak-aj beat a5/a3 of urs) and it doesnt block folding range so its used as bluff shove."

i agree that overbetting 6x might not be optimal play here, i think betting smaller with all of our straights would indeed be a better option. overbet bluffing as an exploit might be ok though, as i would be happy to fold out some of the Ax of his.
about the gto part you are correct, i used calling range with zero QQ-JJ here, so reasoning for bluffshoving would be different, but as always in spots with rather narrowed ranges its all about blockers.

I don't think he would fold an ace with a busted fdraw OTT, and you seemingly overcbetting the flop, in the situation, for that 177% pot bet. Dont think it's bad to cbet if hes overfolding aces on the flop, but that also means, when he calls, the turn hits his range pretty hard, so I don't think KQo is a good candidate foi a second barrell. Anyway, amazingly played overall, great video! Hope to see more.

I'd prefer to have at least some of the top pairs in my double checking range here, otherwise i wont have almost any hands to valuebet most of the rivers

which rivers u would then bet ? seems like there are almost 0% rivers that u wanna bet for value

Almost any river would be a bet, except maybe ace and most kings. When he checks twice our criteria for hand strength needed to bet for value goes down significantly.

aaaayyy