3 Table $2.50/$5 Zoom Session Review
Posted by EluSiVeMark
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 4 Comments...
Hey Mark - nice vid. 41.20s you open QTs on table 1 and fold to a 3bet (hand not discussed) - what range are you defending here - firstly by calling, secondly by 4 betting. What hands are you 4bet bluffing here
Hey thebeegan,
I think QTs is a bit too weak to defend here being oop and 150+ bbs deep.
I would defend some sc's and stronger broadways, aswell as most pairs. I would 4bet KK+ mostly. AK,QQ is a mix between 4betting and calling.
Bluffs would be some blocker type hands and some sc's that play well post.
hey mark great stuff.... regarding 9:00 where we have QQ on JT597:
1.) These kind of spots come up so often and I'm always torn on what to do with my range. I understand in this particular spot call/fold is close with your strong value hands but it seems like to meet it's always close when there's is one card to a straight. Do you think the fact that I'm torn shows that it's one of those spots where call/fold doesn't really matter much playing a GTO opponent in most one card to a straight situations OOP? Obviously if he is non GTO then we can deduce what to do given his tendencies.
2.) I see that you use a smaller/same OR size? Did you always do this? If not, why did you change? Is your EP/MP OR% the same or did you widen it? How do you feel about limping the SB which seems like the new thing to do?
Thanks so much
Good questions:
I think with the QQ hand i've made a little pio sim and it showed that we should mix between calling and folding with QQ given the ranges i gave for both him and me. If we have specific reads we obviously change our strategy. But in these spots we probably should check a large % of our range.
2) I change occasionally my preflop sizing but the results don't change that much. I go a tiny bit wider for every position when i usle smaller sizings.
The sb limp with the current rb% changes is less populair at the mid- lower stakes because more often you pay rake when limping the sb. So atm i don't do that at 600 or lower.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.