Hey Mark nice video
34:17 is A9o too weak to call 3 way there? Are you folding A2o-A9o there?
37:18 with 65o could you overbet this hand otf? Could you have an overbetting range here with your high equity bluffs and your big value hands? Or is that just a bad idea?
Thanks
A9o: Against "normal ranges", so a tight Cc range and a normal UTG range we have about 25% equity. We need 20% for our potodds. I am not sure how much we realize against two tough opponents but in this case it should be a call. I think i folded because i was thinking about a spot on table 3.
65o: While i am typing PIO is loading. Without the results i would think this isn't a board where we have more nutted combos than him. So i think our overall EV will drop a bit if we are going to use overbets and just use a small % of hands to cbet. I do think that this isn't a board that we want to cbet a large % of our range so then a bigger sizing makes sense.
We could use different sizings which is probably optimal, but this will make our strategy very complicated otf and we still have the turn and river to play. Where we are going to have different ranges for the different sizings we used.
PIO: It just put in 2 different flop sizings: 60% and 120%. It's using the overbet 22% and the 60% 27% of the time. So i think using a sizing close to pot should give us a decent EV and a strategy that we could implement more easily.
Hiho in spot where you get raised OTR and you called with T6 (villain turned Q8 into bluff) isnt it 100% polarized spot? What I mean by that is that he can have AQ which beats 100% of your range and you never got AQ. So insnt the right sizing just going allin? He can have then more bluffs. Correct me if I am wrong.
Can u give me the timestamp and then i could try to run a pio report about this hand. I will be going on a holiday for 5 weeks shortly so i might just give you only my thoughts.
Loading 6 Comments...
Hey Mark nice video
34:17 is A9o too weak to call 3 way there? Are you folding A2o-A9o there?
37:18 with 65o could you overbet this hand otf? Could you have an overbetting range here with your high equity bluffs and your big value hands? Or is that just a bad idea?
Thanks
Hi Taiga,
A9o: Against "normal ranges", so a tight Cc range and a normal UTG range we have about 25% equity. We need 20% for our potodds. I am not sure how much we realize against two tough opponents but in this case it should be a call. I think i folded because i was thinking about a spot on table 3.
65o: While i am typing PIO is loading. Without the results i would think this isn't a board where we have more nutted combos than him. So i think our overall EV will drop a bit if we are going to use overbets and just use a small % of hands to cbet. I do think that this isn't a board that we want to cbet a large % of our range so then a bigger sizing makes sense.
We could use different sizings which is probably optimal, but this will make our strategy very complicated otf and we still have the turn and river to play. Where we are going to have different ranges for the different sizings we used.
PIO: It just put in 2 different flop sizings: 60% and 120%. It's using the overbet 22% and the 60% 27% of the time. So i think using a sizing close to pot should give us a decent EV and a strategy that we could implement more easily.
Hiho in spot where you get raised OTR and you called with T6 (villain turned Q8 into bluff) isnt it 100% polarized spot? What I mean by that is that he can have AQ which beats 100% of your range and you never got AQ. So insnt the right sizing just going allin? He can have then more bluffs. Correct me if I am wrong.
Can u give me the timestamp and then i could try to run a pio report about this hand. I will be going on a holiday for 5 weeks shortly so i might just give you only my thoughts.
28:20 3.table
37:24 board 973 what's the reason we are not able to bet ful range for smaller sizing and rather betting with more bigger sizing in this spot?
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.