Out Now
×

$2k SCOOP NL 2-7 Single Draw (part 2)

Posted by

You’re watching:

$2k SCOOP NL 2-7 Single Draw (part 2)

user avatar

George Danzer

Elite Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

$2k SCOOP NL 2-7 Single Draw (part 2)

user avatar

George Danzer

POSTED Aug 11, 2015

George returns with a follow up to his debut video and continues reviewing the footage from his NLSD final table and answering a few questions that were asked on his previous video.

7 Comments

Loading 7 Comments...

almightyzod 9 years, 8 months ago

Excellent video, George. This replay format of being able to see all of the hole cards and analyzing even hands you're not involved in is a very effective approach to teaching the game. I've played less than a dozen hands of nl single draw lifetime and feel like this series has given me a much better idea of how to approach this game and what I need to be thinking about in any given situation.

Question: are there any simple mathematical principles one can utilize in 2-7 (i.e., similar to the "2-4" rule of odds calculation in hold'em) to understand the odds at play? On a related note, are there any tools or resources you'd recommend to improve one's understanding of this game?

Braindead88 9 years, 8 months ago

7:00 If you didn't have the gutshot, how about a cold4 to 10400? You had a tight image as you said and you'd have to assume 810ofclubs is 3b/f a ton and OR is r/f 95%~~ish?

Risking 10.4k to win 6.2k seems okay to me, but might be a bit spewy too ;)

17:14 Calling 22xxx there seems really terrible, despite a 2CD behind. Surprised this happened at a Final table of 2-7.

Braindead88 9 years, 8 months ago

George, I'm afraid that @SCOOP 2016 my edge on the field will be smaller. You're pointing out quite a lot of mistakes with ANY opponent on this final table 2y ago. Lots of great beginner advice and well spent 30min for me, well done!

Richard Gryko 9 years, 8 months ago

I feel like you were correct first time around with the 98642 hand around 35:00. vs a jam you get 3/1 and so it seems like youre going to need to be calling way lower down in your range than tens/some jacks (instinctively it seems like K or A hi hands should be a better threshold to avoid overfolding). vs that range, Hundo is a pretty substantial favourite (he beats 80% of jacks or better, so I assume hes beating like 90% if you start calling worse). when he chks, youre going to bet maybe as low as about J6xxx for value? and maybe paired 4s and 5s to achieve a correct vbet:bluff ratio (willing to be corrected on combinatorics, but those are my first impressions).
Under these assumptions, xc captures around 75% of the pot for Hundo - he beats ~25% of bluffs and 69% of ur 75% vbetting range. .25+(.69*.75)=.25+.52=.77 or 77%. so for xc to outperform jam, he has to beat <77% of ur calling range. For that to be true, the bottom of ur calling range is around a rough J9, which also means ur folding like half ur range to a half pot bet, making jamming the better option exploitatively anyway.

Also, it seems like Hundo shouldve jammed his 9875x a couple hands before this, especially given stacks. Would you agree?

Really enjoying the video series, you're a fun guy to listen to.

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy