$25/50 Three Tables PLO Zoom (part 3)

Posted by

You’re watching:

$25/50 Three Tables PLO Zoom (part 3)

user avatar

Phil Galfond

Elite Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

$25/50 Three Tables PLO Zoom (part 3)

user avatar

Phil Galfond

POSTED May 11, 2015

Phil is back with part 3 of this $25/$50 PLO series where he continues to battle a tough zoom field.

5 Comments

Loading 5 Comments...

WiNgNaPrAyER 9 years, 10 months ago

Yah I was looking around for part 4 but that would be a highly unorthodox and irregularly shoddy production quality error for Phil.G to have cut intentionally to in mid-sentence with no video outro. So am guessing was an inadvertent video making error chalked up to being human...Hope you see this and realize the mistake and re-release, if are not in the process of already doing so Phil :D
Cheers from across my coffee mug and computer screen!

Lifted Mindset 9 years, 10 months ago

Whats up Phil Galfond?

I used to watch you playing NL hold'em on TV. I'm super inspired by you and it pushes me to become a better player myself. This video is insanely informative to me and from the 3 part series, I've learned a lot about our own ranges and how to play them.

An area where I have difficult decisions is when to bluff. It looks like you're bluffing when you're at the bottom of your range and sometimes the middle. Then you're calling with the middle of your range and always the top of your range.

I've been very curious about the word "balance" when it comes to poker value betting and bluffing. When I bluff or call bluffs. I usually ask myself. "Would this player bluff here" or "Is this player good enough to know to bluff here?"

Is this a logical approach or should we be calling with the top of our range to balance ourselves out? I think to play the range game, we need to know that our villains are also playing their ranges. If the villain plays their range unbalanced or poorly, then is that good enough for us to play a little more unbalanced to exploit what they're doing?

Sounds like an obvious yes lol. But when I type or write is when I really figure things out.

Anyway, I'm curious about your thoughts on balance for ourselves vs our villains and how this plays a part in our strategy overall.

benzooka 9 years, 10 months ago

Phil's HUD looks extensively expanded from the post on Phil's HUD Stats. Could someone explain the additions since this thread:
http://www.runitonce.com/chatter/phil-galfonds-hud-stats/

Or any video he explains it will do.
I'm trying to clone his omaha HUD.

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy