Cliffs: my opponents make incorrect call downs, but ofc I have a bluff

Because of the nature of the program, when you are looking at combos we don't know a priori what your are looking at. By the time you have seen what you are looking for you have moved on and are commenting but the viewer has not yet processed the data IMO. I think real time PIO is not as useful as perhaps first doing it your self & briefly summarizing the conclusions . Then perhaps you can present to the viewer the data and ✔️ if it supports your thesis. This would still be valuable to you and would be easier for us to digest. It is a bit more work but value added for both you and the audience. Just a thought. Thank you for the high quality content.

Me I like it because I'm not used to work with PIO.

Kevin,
Its hard to follow the real time analysis because of how PIO is constructed IMO. I would still love to see the PIO analysis and sims but after you have processed them as you suggest. Because we are listening and also looking at the results there is a lag for me between your realizations and my understanding the data that makes it hard to follow meaningfully. PIO is especially hard because it pops up so much data as you look around at the results. You know what you are focusing on as you chose but the person on the other end only knows a posteriori. And then its too late to focus.
Thank you -- Brian

Hey Kevin,

When analysing Pio, i would like to know how far best poker players go into splitting ranges ?

I mean as a human (and especially when playing many tables) it seems tough to be randomizing correctly some decisions w specific combos (% of 3b Q5s, x% of ch back flop w this or that combo) etc etc,

I wonder if best try to follow as much as possible the frequencies Pio suggest (taking into consideration different other factors obv) or if they try to simplify it to something more easy (one combo = 1 decision)

Cheers,

I actually think that real time solver exploration where the viewer also gets the chance to figure out discernable patterns and themes before arriving at the answer actually steepens my learning curve so I loved the pace. I also liked that you explored all different parts of the range. I've gotten better at predicting solver output without knowing exactly why something is happening sometimes so this really helped me to connect the dots

Anywhere to download your pt4 hud profile?