$2.5/$5 NLHE Session Review (part 3)
Posted by John Andress
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 6 Comments...
12:10 55 if he 3bets to like 3.5x how often should we be calling? Should we defend 22-44 at a low frequency, or is that unnecessary?
21:10 J5s how much are they 3betting that you want to fold this pre?
22:15 77 if checked to do you think we should bluff most of our pocket pairs here?
thanks
26:00 TT how tight would btn need to be 3betting for us to fold TT here? At smaller stakes it seems to me that most people are pretty nitty when 3betting vs utg.
thanks
Also I think seeing PIO on that J9 hand at 26:30 would be useful, to know if we should bet big twice or bet small twice.
12:10 I havent evaluated this in my db but im fairly certain that 22-44 wont show a profit vs tough regs even at smaller sizings @ 100bbs
21:10: i think i was just over analyzing here but w/o antes some of these marginal opens aren't going to make a lot vs approx 35% combined 3b
2215: 77 has too much showdown value to bluff, 22,33 and some other lower suited connectors are going to have better removal effects
26: I'd have trouble folding TT in this situation vs this sizing unless you have a specific read that btn is at 2-3% vs utg here and 5bets at a high frequency
7:58 Bottom left table with 66. We x/c flop and get to the river and quickly fold vs 3/4 pot sizing saying we have better hands to call with.
What better hands play this way? 9x+ seems like a river value bet given the flop missed draws so that leaves us with some 7x which might also be interested in value betting. 66 does have some removal on his low card bluffs but is probably not that low in your range. Could you say this fold is an exploit vs a line that isn't particularly bluff heavy?
Great vid btw, looking forward to the next one.
This is tough to answer since knowing bb's tendencies vs sb limps and turn barreling frequencies are important if making your assumptions about value bets. I think a lot of players are going to barrel diamonds, gutters, and some QJ QT JT type combos in this spot and showdown some stronger ace highs and 7x (most weak offsuit aces check behind pre). Some of his weaker Kx and JJ QQ that need less protection will occasionally take this line. Not that this applies to this specific player (bthere is a boss) but in general I am content assuming that most players will not show up with bluffs in situations where the population is under bluffing until they prove otherwise.
Hi John,
Great job. I've watched a couple of your videos and I think they're great quality content.
Cheers!
Hi John, minute 19 97s:
if you say that you've seen a fair amount of weak x/r on this texture and his valuerange is pretty much 6 combos, given that potsize is already at 270$ shouldn't shoving show a pretty good profit in that situation? We have a somewhat static 18% equity vs sets and about 25% equity vs KJ!d, and assuming that we have a fair bit of foldequity shoving seems like a profitable option to me. Also there is the outside chance of him having 87s/43s and getting it in vs the shove and us winning at showdown/getting it in ahead :)
Curious what your view on this is, and keep up the great video content :)
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.